- UID
- 1228285
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2016-8-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been
buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried
by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly
relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s
financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might
well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known
to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel
negative rumors about the company’s health.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following
roles?
(A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a
conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
(B) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a
conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main
conclusion of the argument.
(C) The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the
argument; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks
to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to
establish.
(E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks
to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that
the argument seeks to establish.
答案是A，可是D我觉得也没有问题啊，第一个bf确实是给了这整个讨论的一个 circumstance啊，然后第二个bf也确实是一个explanation关于这个argument的吧
求大神解答~
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2016-10-15 13:54:24
收藏
收藏
