ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 29398|回复: 55
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-24-29

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-13 00:27:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-24-29

24-29: Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pesticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide, therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use is likely to become the norm.



Which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the argument above?


A)    Whether plant scientists have developed insect-resistant seeds for every crop that is currently grown commercially?


B)    Whether farmers typically use agricultural pesticides in large amounts than is necessary to prevent crop damage?


C)    Whether plants grown from the new genetically engineered seeds can be kept completely free of insect damage?


D)    Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do currently used seeds?


E)    Whether most varieties of crops currently grown commercially have greater natural resistance to insect damage than did similar varieties in the past.


答案是D,可是这讨论的是这种改造过的种子和害虫,杀虫剂之间的关系,不明白怎么突然跑出来个产量呢?这相关吗?郁闷阿。。。。。

沙发
发表于 2004-12-13 01:59:00 | 只看该作者

Hi, in my point of veiw, the question is of evaluation type, POE should be cautious, some elements seem to be irrelevant, but are key to choose the right answer. the concern of this question is the cost, if the applying cost of the new seed is lower than the that of the existing seed. then the new seeds will be possible to become the norms.

According to Choice D, if the genetically engineered seeds generate lower crops per acre than the do the current seed,  then the engineered seeds will not  become the norms. however, it will be possible otherwise.  For the new seeds, if with higher cost of seeds but lower production realize  , then obviously there is no economic profit.

am I right? look forward to comments.

板凳
发表于 2004-12-13 02:21:00 | 只看该作者
evaluation题的正确答案是:该选项的不同回答能对原文结论起支持削弱作用。对于D,如果改良品种的产量低,则尽管用农药少和未来价格便宜,但要become the norm农民还是会顾虑它的产量低而不一定用它。故WEAKEN结论。如果产量不低,则由于有用农药少和价格便宜的优点,再加上产量不低,则 become the norm的可能性加大,故SUPPORT结论。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-13 16:56:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢,明白了:)
5#
发表于 2005-5-5 16:37:00 | 只看该作者
请问e为什么不对,如果现在的农作物都有很强的抗病虫的能力,那自然也就不需要什么改良的种子了,相反回答则需要。
6#
发表于 2005-5-5 16:47:00 | 只看该作者

E   Whether most varieties of crops currently grown commercially have greater natural resistance to insect damage than did similar varieties in the past.

又把题目读了一遍,想明白了E是无关比较,比较对象是过去和现在的农作物抗病虫能力,而提干要求的是基因改良后的种子和现在种子的比较

7#
发表于 2005-10-3 15:42:00 | 只看该作者

这题刚看到D时觉得就是答案了,结果再看到E的时候一犹豫就选了E。


E确实是不能构成最直接的评价。除非再补充,目前种植的作物改善的抗病能力已经超过了基因方法改善的抗病能力。

8#
发表于 2005-10-5 14:45:00 | 只看该作者
B为什么不对?
9#
发表于 2005-11-26 12:28:00 | 只看该作者
B呢? 我觉得是B 用农药已经足够了
10#
发表于 2005-12-2 11:26:00 | 只看该作者
B中农民使用农药是否超过需要用量,是无关选项。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 14:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部