ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1193|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全4-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-14 22:03:00 | 只看该作者

大全4-16

16. During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis of those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.


Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?


(D) Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths


(E) Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forces.


D


D是不是说反了?

沙发
发表于 2005-8-15 19:44:00 | 只看该作者
我认为正确答案是D。如果在美国的死亡人数占在美国人口总数的20%,而在美国军队的死亡人数占美国军队总人数的80%。那么,很明显,在军队中的死亡可能性更大,也更危险。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-15 20:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用PHDman在2005-8-15 19:44:00的发言:
我认为正确答案是D。如果在美国的死亡人数占在美国人口总数的20%,而在美国军队的死亡人数占美国军队总人数的80%。那么,很明显,在军队中的死亡可能性更大,也更危险。

这样解释就能说明D选项reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion了吗?

这道题究竟是让选择原文的不合理性还是选择更好的建议啊

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-17 21:45:00 | 只看该作者
absurdity在这里究竟指什么呢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 17:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部