ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3917|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求问两道prep08的阅读题,这篇简直在网上绝了迹了,完全找不到解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-9-18 16:55:53 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Since the1850s researchers have tried to show that variations in seasonal weather areconnected in some ways with sunspots , the outward sign of an increase in theSun's activity. However, sciences lacked evidence supporting such a link untilthe mid-1980s, when van Loon and Labitzke compiled statistical evidencesuggesting that a link exists and that it involves winds in the upperatmosphere above the equator which reverse their direction from east to west orwest to east, every twelve to fifteen months. This phenomenon is called thequasi-biennial oscillation(QBO),and although meteorologists have known aboutthe QBO since the 1950s,until the 1980s no one recognized a subtle butstatistically significant link between the QBO and certain pattern of weather.When the west to east direction of winds in the upper atmosphere coincides withperiods of high solar activity that occur approximately every eleven years,winters in the eastern and central United States are very cold.

  On this basis, some meteorologists predictedthat the winter of 1988-1989 in the United States would be severe. However, thewinter was a mild one overall, and the meteorologists' attempt to make theconnection between the Sun and weather on the Earth appeared unsuccessful,until Barston and Liverzey proposed a hypothesis explaining why the predictionhad failed. They argued that the prediction had not taken into account anotherimportant element in the climate: the more or less regular pattern offluctuations in the temperature of the surface waters of the tropical PacificOcean.
Barston and Livezey noted that when the water temperature is abnormallyhigh-the phenomenon called EL Nino—the changes of cold winter weather overNorth American increase. The opposite situation, when surface temperatures arewell below normal—La Nina—is far less common. In fact, until late 1988 no onehad seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere,and high solar activity.
Thus,according to Barston and Livezey, La Nina cancelled out the effect of the othertwo climatic factors and caused the mild winter of 1988-1989.Although thishypothesis is plausible, much research remains to be done before meteorologistscan establish and explain the effects of increased solar activity on seasonalweather changes.


Q 1 :Which of the following most accuratelydescribes the organization of the passage?
A. Ahypothesis is presented, a theory is constructed on the basis of thehypothesis, and then further research to expand the scope of the theory isproposed.
B.A hypothesis is presented, an example that contradicts it isdescribed, and then a hypothesis accounting for the apparent contradiction isproposed.
C. Twoopposing hypotheses are stated, and evidence confirming one of the hypothesesis considered.
D. Aphenomenon is described, a prediction about that phenomenon is made, andevidence confirming the accuracy of the prediction is presented.
E. A prediction about a phenomenon is detailed andevaluated, and evidence demonstrating the inaccuracy of the prediction ispresented.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Q 2.The passage provides information to support which of the followingstatement about La Nina?

A. Its occurrences is more likely to coincide with the periods of high solaractivity rather than low solar activity.
B. It is more likely to occur when the winds in the upper atmosphere above theequator are blowing from the west rather than from the east.
C. It occurs more frequently than do shifts in the winds in the upperatmosphere above the equator.
D. It occurs less frequently than does increased solaractivity.
E.It occurs lessfrequently than does EL Nino.


答案分别为B和D,楼主第一题选的D,第二题选的E。
百思不得其解答案,无奈这篇文章在网上绝迹了,找不到解释。
跪求解释啊
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2014-9-18 20:36:15 | 只看该作者
同做错了...这个题目太变态了...找到关于第一题的一个很好地解释

http://www.beatthegmat.com/since-the-1850s-researchers-gmat-prep-1-rc-main-idea-t270718.html

第二题也非常容易被骗

when the water temperature is abnormally high--the phenomenon called EL Nino--the changes of cold winter weather over North American increase.
The opposite situation, when surface temperatures arewell below normal—La Nina—is far less common.
这两句话不是讲El Nido和La Nina哪个更common,而是讲两个situation那个更common

In fact, until late 1988 no onehad seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere,and high solar activity.
可以很快判断ABC都是相反的,就是D和E了;然后E提到了high solar activity,实际上可以认为是说从来没有La Nina和后面两个事情combine的情况(也就是说后面两个东西都比La Nina更加frequent)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-20 13:51:23 | 只看该作者
bryant92 发表于 2014-9-18 20:36
同做错了...这个题目太变态了...找到关于第一题的一个很好地解释

http://www.beatthegmat.com/since-the-1 ...

谢谢!!!看完秒懂了!
地板
发表于 2014-10-2 12:43:36 | 只看该作者
第一题我觉得不该错,感觉你是对于文章整体想表达什么,想通过什么方式表达上出现了偏差。也就是对作者的写作意图理解有些偏差。

第二题我也错了。说实话,这种题,本身自己不严谨,不能怪我们错。这种题稍微看一下,理解一下为何官方认为某选项对就可以了。不必纠结。有时候会遇到这种类型的题,本身出的逻辑不够严谨。

Barston and Livezey noted that when the water temperature is abnormallyhigh-the phenomenon called EL Nino—the changes of cold winter weather overNorth American increase. The opposite situation, when surface temperatures arewell below normal—La Nina—is far less common

这句话给人的直观感受就是,la nina的far less common是相对前一种现象去说的。两者是一个并列,对比的关系。所有人都会这么想。即使像楼上所说的,这是对比两种situation,那么两种situation又具体指的是什么situation呢?
冬天冷冬天热的situation?如果是这样的话,那么这句并不能作为评判la na比谁更频繁的依据。

再看楼上提到的后一句,In fact, until late 1988 no onehad seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere,and high solar activity.这句说,这三种现象同时发生的概率非常低。如何使三种现象同时发生的概率低,有一种,是楼上提到的,如果la nina的frequency本身就非常低的话,可以造成该种结果。但是,可以造成该种结果的前提很多,比如,la nina的频率并不低,但是它的档期,刚好总是错开另外两者,这也能导致三者同时发生的概率低。

为什么选D,因为出题人他自己觉得他描述的够清晰,但是对我们来讲其实不够清晰。他的思路是,第一句,说la na-is far less
common(这里他不是与前文进行对比,而是为后文写原因),紧接着,注意是紧接着,他说,in fact三者同时发生的概率低。
他其实是想写一个因果表达,就是is far less common,导致了后面的in fact,三者同时出现频率低。

所以他想表达的意思是,因为la na 的频率最低,所以,三者同时出现的概率低。

只能说这文章自己写的不够清晰。

5#
发表于 2015-10-10 09:52:14 | 只看该作者
第二题答案是错的,应该是E,据Ron在论坛上所说prep这个文档的答案很多错呃
6#
发表于 2016-2-20 20:57:31 | 只看该作者
亲,求PREP08阅读
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-11 13:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部