ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9681|回复: 35
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 2019版 SC 考试方向的转移 掉坑里的都看看

  [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-7-3 11:31:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式


我今年过完新年,想考GMAT了,然后就当我准备4个月之后,报名后,这考试改革了,然后我就发现这个屌毛考试改革后,真的变难了,阅读重要性跃居第一,然后就是句子修正的变化。我2011年的时候,考过一次G,720分,那时候没有一辈子只能考8次的决定,后来因为工作很忙,我也没用,现在过期了,又要考了,然后我一直没考是因为我发现现在的GMAT考试和我那时候变得更注重逻辑了。对于脑海中一直认为一个月换一次裤的我,看到现在基本都是10天换裤,真是措手不及,原来这几年这个考试变化了这么多。

先说重点,OG 19的句子修正考试重心变为纯逻辑意思考察,我认为句子改错已经不是一个准确翻译了,更多是在修正句子的逻辑意思。我觉得要认真读一下OG 19了,GMAT考试时间缩短,看似轻描淡写,其实是一个重磅炸弹,时间缩短,考试重心变化,各科目的逻辑意思加强,容错率降为0,尤其是句子修正部分,一旦掉裤,完全拉不回来了。

“ Sentence Correction的introduction在过往6个版本的《官方指南》中一直维持6页的篇幅,十分稳定,然而在最新发布的《OG19》中,该部分内容从6页增至23页。

1. 完善SC考察定义,补充SC考察内容;

内容1,关于“SC考察逻辑”:

"However, that understanding does not have to come from extensive explicit training in grammar and usage or from knowledge of specialized linguistic terminology. Many people may have the needed insight without being able to explain in the technical terms.

The more difficult questions are not essentially designed to test for knowledge of rules or facts that are harder to learn or that require more technical training. Difficulty often stems from complexity and subtlety among the interconnected parts of the sentence and involves critical applications of principles that all astute users of English should understand."

这段话写得非常精辟,我们逐字逐句来学习一下:

然而,这种融会贯通并不必须来源于大量语法规则的练习、语法术语的练习,很多对语法规则、语法术语并不那么精通的考生仍然具备我们(指GMAC)所想要考察的技能。

难题设置的难点并不在于更加难以掌握的语法规则或更加生僻的语法术语,难题的特征主要是在句子结构复杂的同时需要考生灵活运用逻辑原则,而这种逻辑原则是所有机智的英语使用者都应该掌握的。

Yellow jackets number among the 900 or so species of the world's social wasps, wasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of females—the queen and her sterile female workers.

A. wasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of
B. wasps that live in a highly cooperative and organized society consisting almost entirely of
C. which means they live in a highly cooperative and organized society, almost all
D. which means that their society is highly cooperative, organized, and it is almost entirely
E. living in a society that is highly cooperative, organized, and it consists of almost all

答案是B,A错在逻辑意思,wasps不是社会,不能用v-ing去修饰整个主语,十分微妙,A的语法完全正确。

内容2,关于“平行”:

“Words or phrases that have similar roles in a sentence should be treated in ways that make the similarity clear. This often requires ensuring that parallel clause shave parallel structure, that verbs having the same function are in the same form, and that elements within the scope of a modifier all relate to the modifier in the same way.”

意思就是:

平行的本质是平行元素在句子中的逻辑地位对等,而不仅仅拘泥于平行标志词或者平行形式。

Shoppers in sporting goods stores, unlike in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, not buying a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but they leave with a basketball only.

A. in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, not buying a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but they leave with a basketball only
B. in department stores, shop impulsively very little; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not also buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well
C. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, do not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but leave with only a basketball
D. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well
E. department stores, shop impulsively very little; someone will not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball but will leave with only a basketball

答案是D,C是完美平行结构,但逻辑错误,因为后面两个消费细节隶属于impulse shopping,如果凭借简单平行形式去选,很容易选错。

2.  “Some complicating factors to consider”

对于2个存在争议的问题,官方首次给出回应:

回应1:as well as和and 等价问题
“as well as is an entirely acceptable equivalent of and or in addition to.”

意思就是:
此次官方给出实锤:as well as和and可以等价替换,即选项中出现as well as和and不可作为split对有关选项进行排除。

3. “Some issues that are not tested”
明确非考点内容:

非考点1:标点符号
“You will need to judge issues of punctuation insofar as they involve standard conventions that make a difference for the meaning and coherence of the sentence. You will not need to judge, for example,whether a comma should be inside or outside a closing quotation mark.”

意思就是:
除非标点符号涉及到句法规则,如:逗号不能用于连接两个独立的句子,其余标点符号的用法不做考查。诸如“我觉得逗号放在这里不太好”、“我觉得这里应该补出一个逗号用于间隔”等都不在考查范围。

非考点2:that / which的区别
“Some American publishers have adopted the convention that which, used as a relative pronoun, should always be nonrestrictive and should be replaced with that in restrictive clause (as in“laws which have been replaced are no longer enforced” versus “laws that have been replaced are no longer enforced”). You should not expect to see questions for which the deciding factor is merely whether the writer adheres to this convention.”

which和that的限定和非限定修饰语法重要性被削弱。
大家争议很久的考点“that只能引导限定性定语从句(前面一定不能有逗号)和which只能引导非限定性定语从句 (前面一定要有逗号)”,官方给出实锤:不考!不考!不考!重要的事情说三遍。

Carnivorous mammals can endure what would otherwise be lethal levels of body heat because they have a heat-exchange network which kept the brain from getting too hot.

a) which kept
b) that keeps
c) which has kept
d) that has been keeping
e) having kept

答案是B,因为只有B是一般时态,逻辑正确,虽然是用that去修饰network。

我发现近期改革后,高分的人很少,估计都是掉坑里了,我也不急着考,希望大家考试的时候做SC首先从逻辑句意出发,而不要从表面语法形式选答案。

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏23 收藏收藏23
沙发
发表于 2018-7-3 12:59:40 | 只看该作者
令人害怕……感谢楼主分享了
板凳
发表于 2018-7-3 13:17:39 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主总结
地板
发表于 2018-7-3 13:31:02 | 只看该作者
感谢分享,但是我想说,难道不是本来就是这样么,怎么LZ有种恍然大悟的感觉
现在大部分的题几乎都要从逻辑出发才能选出答案,那些套路越来越少了。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-7-3 13:58:36 | 只看该作者
that_dumpling 发表于 2018-7-3 13:31
感谢分享,但是我想说,难道不是本来就是这样么,怎么LZ有种恍然大悟的感觉
现在大部分的题几乎都要从逻辑 ...

以前吧 起码低分的题目是靠语法的 现在是整套裤都是逻辑sc 已经没有语法考点了 而且这是OG SC 第一次写了很多新考点 让SC更难了 如果考你10道sc逻辑 一题逻辑比一题难 五个选项都是语法对的 其中两三个逻辑错误你大大咧咧根本读不出来 但是你要选啊 然后选错了 然后就掉裤了 versus 500分值的sc考语法 然后你升裤了 到了 700+分值的考逻辑 起码选的过程就是不一样的
6#
发表于 2018-7-3 14:13:09 | 只看该作者
cowdoin 发表于 2018-7-3 13:58
以前吧 起码低分的题目是靠语法的 现在是整套裤都是逻辑sc 已经没有语法考点了 而且这是OG SC 第一次写了 ...

这个趋势应该是好的,应该是先有逻辑才形成的固定的语法,这样考感觉更科学些,可以纠正学习备考方向,当然对于之前从语法出发的考生就苦了。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-7-3 14:16:49 | 只看该作者
that_dumpling 发表于 2018-7-3 14:13
这个趋势应该是好的,应该是先有逻辑才形成的固定的语法,这样考感觉更科学些,可以纠正学习备考方向,当 ...

以前做完阅读和逻辑 已经挺累了 看到sc还挺亲切的 起码还能看看语法啊 现在看到sc好像看到瘟神 处处是陷阱
8#
发表于 2018-7-3 15:00:39 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
9#
发表于 2018-7-3 15:28:14 | 只看该作者
请问OG19现在出了吗?网上有电子版了吗?谢谢!
10#
发表于 2018-7-3 15:41:36 | 只看该作者
同问,现在有电子版吗?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-15 21:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部