ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2951|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

some questions

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-8-15 23:09:00 | 只看该作者

some questions

)the movement is not....... nor (neither)is it......这个我就不明白了,为什么后面要用is it呢?为什么不是it is.......
   3)划线部分是{{what is much more difficult to determine is}}the reason .... ,the use ..... ,and the meanning .....这样用可以吗?我记得白勇上课说过应该那两个is 都是 are才对把?
   4)Three out of every four autumobile owners in the us also own a bicycle.我还是不太明白,为什么可以说这么多人有一辆车?应该加一个each才对把?
   5)less和lesser用法有什么区别吗?vast quantities of people有错吗?
   6)Following the nutrition board's advice on salt consumption would mean a virtual end of the use of salt in cooking,and avoidance of obviously salty foods ,and {{a reduced reliance on processed foods that contain significant but often hidden amounts of sodium}}这对吗?我觉得中心词应该是reduction才能和前面并列,而不是reliance

  放在语法区2天居然没人回答,只有在这请教各位了,还是这的斑竹比较好。。。
沙发
发表于 2003-8-16 08:39:00 | 只看该作者
6)reduce修饰reliance,并列部分是a virtual end……avoidance……a reduced reliance,都在于表现减少盐的使用,不然,reliance 要放在哪里?
板凳
发表于 2003-8-16 08:48:00 | 只看该作者
“Three out of every four autumobile owners in the us also own a bicycle.”是OG252题,一是可以用排除法。OWN与THREE主谓一致,a bicycle指每人一辆,如果变成bicycles,就变成每人多辆了。建议看看og的解释
地板
发表于 2003-8-16 08:55:00 | 只看该作者
the movement is not....... nor (neither)is it......这个我就不明白了,为什么后面要用is it呢?为什么不是it is.......
  
因为, nor (neither)位于句首, 要用倒装句式.

3)划线部分是{{what is much more difficult to determine is}}the reason .... ,the use ..... ,and the meanning .....这样用可以吗?我记得白勇上课说过应该那两个is 都是 are才对把?

我个人认为, 用两个"are". 因为the reason .... ,the use ..... ,and the meanning .....表多个原因.

   4)Three out of every four autumobile owners in the us also own a bicycle.我还是不太明白,为什么可以说这么多人有一辆车?应该加一个each才对把?

句意是: 每四个有汽车的人中有三个人也同时有一辆自行车.
所以, each 不用加了.

  5)less和lesser用法有什么区别吗?vast quantities of people有错吗?
less和lesser在做比较时用区别不大, 但less更常用. 另外, less 还可做副词, 介词和名词; 而 lesser无这些用法. vast quantities of people错, 因为people是复数集合名词, 不可数.

   6)Following the nutrition board's advice on salt consumption would mean a virtual end of the use of salt in cooking,and avoidance of obviously salty foods ,and {{a reduced reliance on processed foods that contain significant but often hidden amounts of sodium}}这对吗?我觉得中心词应该是reduction才能和前面并列,而不是reliance

句子是对的. reliance, avoidance 和end 可并列. 只是, 上面的红色"and"是不是多余了?

Btw, the forum moderators at the grammar zone are also excellent. Probably, these days they are, just like you, busy with GMAT preparation as well. Good luck!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-31 23:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部