ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 61956|回复: 144
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd1 10,12 迷惑

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-19 16:10:00 | 只看该作者

gwd1 10,12 迷惑


      Over the last 150 years, large


       stretches of salmon habitat have


       been eliminated by human activity:


Line       mining, livestock grazing, timber


  (5)      harvesting, and agriculture as well


as recreational and urban devel-


opment.  The numerical effect is


obvious:  there are fewer salmon


in degraded regions than in pris-


(10)      tine ones; however, habitat loss


also has the potential to reduce


genetic diversity.  This is most


evident in cases where it results


in the extinction of entire salmon


(15)      populations.  Indeed, most


analysts believe that some kind


of environmental degradation


underlies the demise of many


extinct salmon populations.


(20)      Although some rivers have


       been recolonized, the unique


       genes of the original populations


have been lost.


      Large-scale disturbances in


(25)      one locale also have the potential


to alter the genetic structure of


populations in neighboring areas,


even if those areas have pristine


habitats.  Why?  Although the


(30)      homing instinct of salmon to their


natal stream is strong, a fraction


of the fish returning from the sea


       (rarely more than 15 percent)


stray and spawn in nearby


(35)    streams.  Low levels of straying


are crucial, since the process


provides a source of novel


genes and a mechanism


      by which a location can be


(40)     repopulated should the fish


there disappear.  Yet high rates


of straying can be problematic


because misdirected fish may


interbreed with the existing stock


(45)      to such a degree that any local


adaptations that are present


become diluted.  Straying


rates remain relatively low when


environmental conditions are


(50)      stable, but can increase dramati-


cally when streams suffer severe


disturbance.  The 1980 volcanic


eruption of Mount Saint Helens,


for example, sent mud and debris


(55)      into several tributaries of the


Columbia River.  For the next


couple of years, steelhead trout


(a species included among the


salmonids) returning from the


(60)      sea to spawn were forced to


find alternative streams.  As


a consequence, their rates of


straying, initially 16 percent,


rose to more than 40 percent


(65)      overall.


      Although no one has quantified


changes in the rate of straying


as a result of the disturbances


caused by humans, there is no


(70)      reason to suspect that the effect


would be qualitatively different


than what was seen in the


aftermath of the Mount Saint


Helens eruption.  Such a dra-


(75)      matic increase in straying from


damaged areas to more pristine


streams results in substantial


gene flow, which can in turn lower


the overall fitness of subsequent


generations.



Q10:


It can be inferred from the passage that the occasional failure of some salmon to return to their natal streams in order to spawn provides a mechanism by which


              


A.     pristine streams that are near polluted streams become polluted themselves


B.     the particular adaptations of a polluted stream’s salmon population can be preserved without dilution


C.     the number of salmon in pristine habitats decreases relative to the number in polluted streams


D.     an environmentally degraded stream could be recolonized by new salmon populations should the stream recover


E.      the extinction of the salmon populations that spawn in polluted streams is accelerated


Q12:


The author mentions the “aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption” (lines 73-74) most likely in order to


A.     provide an example of the process that allows the repopulation of rivers whose indigenous salmon population has become extinct


B.     indicate the extent to which the disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity in one stream might affect the genetic structure of salmon populations elsewhere


C.     provide a standard of comparison against which the impact of human activity on the gene flow among salmon populations should be measured


D.     show how salmons’ homing instinct can be impaired as a result of severe environmental degradation of their natal streams


E.      show why straying rates in salmon populations remain generally low except when spawning streams suffer severe environmental disturbance


Q10,key is D,what's wrong with B?


Q12, the key is C, what's wrong with B?


Thanks for your patience to plough through this article.



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-19 16:17:17编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-6-20 10:49:00 | 只看该作者
10: Low levels of straying



are crucial, since the process



provides a source of novel



genes and a mechanism



      by which a location can be



(40)     repopulated should the fish



there disappear.


You may read the above sentence again, and understand the true meaning of "repopulated"


12:


B.     indicate the extent to which the disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity in one stream might affect the genetic structure of salmon populations elsewhere


the text does not mention that disturbance can influence the genetic structure. only genetic flow can be affected.


To be discussed...


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-20 21:14:00 | 只看该作者

Weiyu, thanks. Yet I have some different opinion.

12, "measured" in C is wrong. The article doesn't talk about anything as to measuring something. Besides, " Large-scale disturbances in   (25)   one locale also have the potential to alter the genetic structure of populations in neighboring areas," mentioned this "genetic structure". The 2nd and 3rd paragraph actually are engaged in the impact that the disturbance in one locale has on another locale, so "indicate the extent..." is correct.

wanting more remarks....

地板
发表于 2004-6-21 14:36:00 | 只看该作者

For Q12: It hard to choose between B &C.


However, for item B the "Mount Saint Helens eruption" is irrelevant to the "by human activity" mentioned in choose B, although the eruption did have some effects on the salmon.


I prefer C. the eruption did provide us a reference for identify the effects of the human activity, although the reference by eruption is not by human activity.


What do you think, Tianwan?



Although no one has quantified





changes in the rate of straying



as a result of the disturbances



caused by humans, there is no



(70)      reason to suspect that the effect



would be qualitatively different



than what was seen in the



aftermath of the Mount Saint



Helens eruption.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-22 17:24:00 | 只看该作者

12, Thanks, opeman. Yet I still hold my standpoint in that "no one has quantified changes" means no measuring is involved.  So C is wrong.


And "aftermath of MSH eruption" is relative "disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity",  so B should be OK


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-22 17:32:24编辑过]
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-22 17:40:00 | 只看该作者

10, D is wrong because it mentions that "the recovered stream could be recolonized by new salmon populations".

In the stem of the question, the "occasional failure" opposes to "high rate". "high rate" means "diluted", so "occasional failure" should mean "without dilution".

7#
发表于 2004-6-24 01:35:00 | 只看该作者
Q10.  I agree that D is the best answer.
According to the passage, if a stream was polluted and all salmon there died, occassional stray of salmon from somewhere elseto this stream may repopulate this stream.  Since all the old ones aregone, so it's O.K. to say that the stream is recolonized by newpopulations.
8#
发表于 2004-6-24 01:45:00 | 只看该作者

Q12 I think C is better, althoughI have some reservation to the word "standard" there.
In paragraph 2 (P2) where effects of MSH eruption is discussed, the passage does not discuss any "
disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity".  The passage compares the effects of human activity with that of MSH eruption only in P3.  So, although we can say that in P2, the author gives a reference (effects of MSH eruption), and later in P3 the author compares the effects of human activity with that reference, it's too far-stretched to say that mentioning of MSH itself indicates the effects of human activity.

9#
发表于 2004-7-5 15:50:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-22 17:24:00的发言:

12, Thanks, opeman. Yet I still hold my standpoint in that "no one has quantified changes" means no measuring is involved.  So C is wrong.


And "aftermath of MSH eruption" is relative "disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity",  so B should be OK




我的理解是:measure并不意味着定量,而是有 evaluation(评估)的意思。正是因为no one has quantified changes,所以,The 1980 volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens的后果提供了一个可以参照的标准。

所以我认为应该是C.

10#
发表于 2004-7-10 04:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ReedSong在2004-7-5 15:50:00的发言:




我的理解是:measure并不意味着定量,而是有 evaluation(评估)的意思。正是因为no one has quantified changes,所以,The 1980 volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens的后果提供了一个可以参照的标准。

所以我认为应该是C.



同意,measure并不一定是一个精确的测量,也可以是一种大致估计。C里面的comparasion是关键,表明了作者举例的作用。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 15:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部