ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1055|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道gwd逻辑题,我觉得自己的想法也很有道理啊

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-5-7 21:04:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

The argument above requires which of following assumptions?
ADuring the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.  
BThe one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a smaller tax increase.  
CThe pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax increase.  
DFor the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes was not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.  
EAs the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.  


GWD题,答案为D
[提问]: 我觉得这道题明明A,D都能说通。
假设无非是要排除“可能是税前价太高导致的销量下降”!,这样才能论证是税后价的影响。

A:年1,销量下降1%,
年2, 加税,销量下降10%。
年1的销售下降应该是由于税前价上涨带来的,那么如果年二2税前价涨幅与年1一样甚至更低的话,就可以证明这么大的销售滑坡一定是加税带来的了。
这就是A选项的意思。

请问我这么理解哪里不对?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-6-10 14:28:09 | 只看该作者
顶一下……求大神回复!感激不尽
板凳
发表于 2014-6-12 12:54:25 | 只看该作者
我的理解:
A:
比如第一年税前10税10总价20
第二年税前9税18总价27

第二年税前价低了但总价还是高了

但是D就说的很严谨,把数量关系考虑进去了,只要第二年降得价低于8cent(税涨的价) 就能保证第二年的总价还是高于第一年
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-30 03:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部