1. 一間公司根據Research說運動有益健康,可以減少50%疾病發作率;
而文中的公司有提供健身設施,所以公司決定要減少員工健康保險的費用,以縮減支出 The following appeared in amemo to the Saluda town council from the town’s business manager: “Researchindicates that those who exercise regularly are hospitalized less than half asoften as those who don’t exercise. By providing a well-equipped gym forSaluda’s municipal employees, we should be able to reduce the cost of our grouphealth insurance coverage by approximately 50 percent and thereby achieve abalanced town budget.” Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc. 1)Gratuitous Assumption (employeeswill exercise regularly if a well-equipped facility is provided for them ) 2)Gratuitous Assumption (assumptionthat employee do not exercise regulary) 3) 充分必要条件 (hospitalization rate and healthinsurance cost)
我在练习的时候虽然也知道第三点讲的降低了住院率和最终的降低保健费用的逻辑关联有点问题,但感觉自己总想不出重点来undermine这一点
我的逻辑思路就是因为减少住院率所以看病费用减少,报销的费用就小了,那么公司可以买便宜的保险,保险能cover的费用正好是报销的费用,原来的保险因为能COVER的费用大于实际报销的费用所以不买了
但我就是找不到能够undermine的一击必杀的点,总是在打擦边球感觉自己的argument很weak,所以特地请教一下大大们
|