ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1647|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]Feifei-95

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-13 12:34:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]Feifei-95

95. Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration. Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams conducted by single researchers.


Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


(A) Prolific writers can inflate the number of citations they receive by citing themselves in subsequent papers.


(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received.


(C) The number of citations a paper receives is a measure of the importance of the research it reports.


(D) The collaborative efforts of scientists who are citizens of the same country do not produce papers that are as important as papers that are produced by international collaboration.


(E) International research teams tend to be more generously funded than are single researchers.



答案是C.可怜我对highlight的那句话理解不了!不明白啊,想的头都疼了.

沙发
发表于 2004-11-13 21:50:00 | 只看该作者
这句话应该有错。可能这句话为:This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE RESEARCH PROJECTS conducted by single researchers. 这句话为原文结论。答案C较易理解。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-14 05:00:00 | 只看该作者
没错,现在理解起来C 就很显然了. 我的FEIFEI 题是从这里下的,看来这道题题目需要UPDATE一下. 谢谢你的解释.
地板
发表于 2006-9-13 14:20:00 | 只看该作者

能翻译一下这题么?

不知道他想说什么

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-1 07:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部