ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Since the inception of Project Safe Neighborhoods five years ago, which seeks to reduce armed robberies by convincing people to sell their guns to the municipal government, the number of armed robberies has decreased by ten percent nationwide. Simultaneously, there has been a decrease in the number of reports in which convicted criminals are found to be in possession of guns. It is clear that Project Safe Neighborhoods has convinced many individuals not to own guns and thus not to commit armed robberies.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

正确答案: E

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1141|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

削弱题求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-29 17:27:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Since the inception of Project Safe Neighborhoods five years ago, which seeks to reduce armed robberies by convincing people to sell their guns to the municipal government, the number of armed robberies has decreased by ten percent nationwide. Simultaneously, there has been a decrease in the number of reports in which convicted criminals are found to be in possession of guns. It is clear that Project Safe Neighborhoods has convinced many individuals not to own guns and thus not to commit armed robberies.

  Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A.Over the course of the last ten years, the number of individuals who commit gun crimes but evade arrest has not increased.
B.The number of guns sold to the government in Project Safe Neighborhoods has been consistent throughout the five years that the program has been in existence.
C.Gun shop owners have reported a decline in patrons seeking to buy guns for legitimate purposes since the inception of the project.
D.Surveys suggest that the majority of people have not been impacted by gun crimes either before or after the inception of the Project Safe Neighborhoods program.
E.Five years ago, a law passed which restricts gun shop owners from selling guns to patrons without a one week waiting period and a background check.

本题可以排除ABCD 但是不能讲清楚为什么E削弱了逻辑链 求指点
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-12-1 10:53:57 | 只看该作者
顶啊顶啊顶~~~~~大神来帮我啊~~~
板凳
发表于 2012-12-1 16:13:13 | 只看该作者
E项说明五年前实施的law也可以降低使用枪支犯罪的数量,这样的话,说明原文中project的实施不是唯一或者根本不是使犯罪数量下降的因素,从而不能根据两者之间的时间前后关系来用前者推断后者
地板
发表于 2012-12-3 01:08:25 | 只看该作者
楼上说的对
E 我重点看那个background check ,大概有的人会无法通过这个Check因而买不上枪支,因此E成为另一个让持枪人数减少的原因
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-12 16:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部