ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: miffyhui
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家帮帮忙,解答一下这道RC,谢谢!

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-7 20:53:36 | 只看该作者
总是感觉OG中有几道题,对于错误选项有些似懂非懂,感觉自己在死抠,掉进去就出不来~ 但是,不弄明白,下次又有可能掉进去
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-7 21:04:41 | 只看该作者
Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways,since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

7. The passage implies that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?
(A) Company profits resulting from such innovations
may be reinvested in that company with no
guarantee that the company will continue to
make further improvements in ecoefficiency.
(B) Company growth fostered by cost savings from
such innovations may allow that company to
manufacture a greater number of products that
will be used and discarded, thus worsening
environmental stress.
(C) A company that fails to realize significant cost
savings from such innovations may have little
incentive to continue to minimize the
environmental impact of its production
processes.
(D) A company that comes to depend on such
innovations to increase its profits and growth
may be vulnerable in the global market to
competition from old-style eco-inefficient industries.
(E) A company that meets its ecoefficiency goals is
unlikely to invest its increased profits in the
development of new and innovative ecoefficiency
Measures.
这道题的A也不怎么明白,没有彻底理解,能不能顺便解答一下,谢谢~
13#
发表于 2012-10-7 21:48:47 | 只看该作者
A:
1.既然是restrict participation to patients,怎么可能会是yield more data
2.上一句已经讲了enroll more patient-->obtaining 。。。more representative sample。。。,而researchers通常是restrict participation,那就说明前者才是更accurate。

OA:C:
“Often researchers restrict study participation to patients who have no ailments besides those being studied. ”蓝色highlight就是对应C选项的 limit the variables
个人意见哈~~open to discuss
-- by 会员 clover928 (2012/10/7 19:52:34)





这句:researchers collect far more back ground information on patients than is strictly required for their trials substantially more than hospitals collect thereby escalating costs of data collection,storage, and analysis.
说明收集了单个病人更多的信息,个人感觉不能推出哪种方法收集的数据更多
researchers花更多功夫收集单个病人的更多信息
F提出收集更多病人的信息,限制单个病人的信息收集Frazier and Mosteller propose not only that researchers limit data collection on individual patients but also that researchers enroll more patients in clinical trials
不知道对不?
-- by 会员 miffyhui (2012/10/7 20:45:22)



er...
我个人认为collect far more bg info跟yield more data不是同一个范畴。yield是得到的数据,当然是大样本可以得到的数据更多。(背景信息跟得到的数据不是同一个范畴)
在这个restrict这个点上我理解跟og对A选项的解答是吻合的
open to discuss
14#
发表于 2012-10-7 21:50:29 | 只看该作者
Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways,since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

7. The passage implies that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?
(A) Company profits resulting from such innovations
may be reinvested in that company with no
guarantee that the company will continue to
make further improvements in ecoefficiency.
(B) Company growth fostered by cost savings from
such innovations may allow that company to
manufacture a greater number of products that
will be used and discarded, thus worsening
environmental stress.
(C) A company that fails to realize significant cost
savings from such innovations may have little
incentive to continue to minimize the
environmental impact of its production
processes.
(D) A company that comes to depend on such
innovations to increase its profits and growth
may be vulnerable in the global market to
competition from old-style eco-inefficient industries.
(E) A company that meets its ecoefficiency goals is
unlikely to invest its increased profits in the
development of new and innovative ecoefficiency
Measures.
这道题的A也不怎么明白,没有彻底理解,能不能顺便解答一下,谢谢~
-- by 会员 miffyhui (2012/10/7 21:04:41)



A选项的further错误,文章说的是现在eco,不能确保将来保持一样的eco
15#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-7 22:16:08 | 只看该作者
A:
1.既然是restrict participation to patients,怎么可能会是yield more data
2.上一句已经讲了enroll more patient-->obtaining 。。。more representative sample。。。,而researchers通常是restrict participation,那就说明前者才是更accurate。

OA:C:
“Often researchers restrict study participation to patients who have no ailments besides those being studied. ”蓝色highlight就是对应C选项的 limit the variables
个人意见哈~~open to discuss
-- by 会员 clover928 (2012/10/7 19:52:34)






这句:researchers collect far more back ground information on patients than is strictly required for their trials substantially more than hospitals collect thereby escalating costs of data collection,storage, and analysis.
说明收集了单个病人更多的信息,个人感觉不能推出哪种方法收集的数据更多
researchers花更多功夫收集单个病人的更多信息
F提出收集更多病人的信息,限制单个病人的信息收集Frazier and Mosteller propose not only that researchers limit data collection on individual patients but also that researchers enroll more patients in clinical trials
不知道对不?
-- by 会员 miffyhui (2012/10/7 20:45:22)




er...
我个人认为collect far more bg info跟yield more data不是同一个范畴。yield是得到的数据,当然是大样本可以得到的数据更多。(背景信息跟得到的数据不是同一个范畴)
在这个restrict这个点上我理解跟og对A选项的解答是吻合的
open to discuss
-- by 会员 clover928 (2012/10/7 21:48:47)


噢,谢谢啦~懂了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-10 06:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部