ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: DUKB24
打印 上一主题 下一主题

贴道IR题欢迎大牛们来讨论发表意见,对这题比较困惑

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2012-5-28 04:55:22 | 只看该作者
"完全可以根据(1)推出的选项直接推出(2)的答案。。。。"

You're right. In fact, IR session is designed this way - providing us with extraneous information to test our ability to weed the extraneous stuffs and integrate the useful stuffs. We are rewarded for finding a strategic and efficient way to complete the required task.
22#
发表于 2012-6-5 10:29:07 | 只看该作者
可是如果教授A是Limit effort从而为了支持Primary school、以及为了提供医疗和农业支持的话,第一题为啥不选A呢?
23#
发表于 2012-6-6 06:05:21 | 只看该作者
43B的答案不是f 么?
24#
发表于 2012-6-8 20:59:18 | 只看该作者
Professor A 支持在poorest areas 的学校砸钱--发放药物、提供蚊帐这类卫生保健的物品,A还支持在农业方面砸钱。
Professor B 说在学校砸钱没用,还不如修条好路,一旦村民们能把农产品运送到market,做起了生意,村民们将会自愿为school花钱。(Once local farmers can transport produce to market they will be willing to pay for schools...)

C项是Professor A反对的:The aid industry should focus its spending less on primary education than it now does.

同时,C项又是Professor B支持的,他给出的理由就是F项:
F项: Projects in education are more likely to be successful if they are paid for by local people. (题干已经讲过:education work没啥用,当村民can transport produce to market后,他们会自愿pay for schools--and to make sure the schools succeed.)
25#
发表于 2012-9-9 14:39:37 | 只看该作者
Professor A 支持在poorest areas 的学校砸钱--发放药物、提供蚊帐这类卫生保健的物品,A还支持在农业方面砸钱。
Professor B 说在学校砸钱没用,还不如修条好路,一旦村民们能把农产品运送到market,做起了生意,村民们将会自愿为school花钱。(Once local farmers can transport produce to market they will be willing to pay for schools...)

C项是Professor A反对的:The aid industry should focus its spending less on primary education than it now does.

同时,C项又是Professor B支持的,他给出的理由就是F项:
F项: Projects in education are more likely to be successful if they are paid for by local people. (题干已经讲过:education work没啥用,当村民can transport produce to market后,他们会自愿pay for schools--and to make sure the schools succeed.)
-- by 会员 atlantis0724 (2012/6/8 20:59:18)

可是“to"表目的的话,为什么是spending,而不是spend
26#
发表于 2014-5-13 12:13:35 | 只看该作者
http://gmatclub.com/forum/this-ir-questions-stumped-me-2-professors-statements-133676.html

来自mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
的解释清楚明白
27#
发表于 2015-6-3 16:51:40 | 只看该作者
我来分享一下limit to的用法:(我是看了这个后有所启发的)
其他的,楼上的都说的很明白了。
limit to
limit someone to something
1. to restrict someone to a certain amount or number of something. I will have to limit you to two helpings of mashed potatoes. I limit myself to cola drinks only.
2. to restrict someone to a certain area. Please try to limit your children to your own yard. They limited themselves to the north side of town.
See also: limit
limit something to something
to restrict something to a limited set, a certain amount, or a specific number of something. Please limit your comments to five minutes. Can you limit your remarks to the subject at hand?
28#
发表于 2015-9-4 02:07:42 | 只看该作者
謝謝newconcept大大
我看了好久結果看了你的解釋豁然開朗
29#
发表于 2016-8-29 22:27:27 | 只看该作者
yyq90 发表于 2012-6-5 10:29
可是如果教授A是Limit effort从而为了支持Primary school、以及为了提供医疗和农业支持的话,第一题为啥不 ...

我也是看了很久才看明白为啥不选A.

A和C都是disagree, 但是我们要选的不单是disagree,还要是在别的选项中可以找到来支持ProfessorB的。那么B的观点是不要投入在学校和教育上而应该修路,但并没有提到农业和保健。所以C更佳。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 09:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部