ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1475|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG12-10-49

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-3-27 14:31:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG12的第10篇第49题,
49. The author of the passage would be most likely to
describe the explanation provided by the human
capital theory for the high concentration of women in
certain occupations in the seventeenth-century
Florentine textile industry as
(A) well founded though incomplete
(B) difficult to articulate
(C) plausible but poorly substantiated
(D) seriously flawed
(E) contrary to recent research

答案是A,我选择的是C,看了后面的注释还是不理解,注释如下:

Logical structure
Th is question requires an evaluation of the
author’s point of view. What does the author
think of the human capital explanation of
women’s occupational concentration in the
Florentine textile industry? In line 5, the author
characterizes the theory as useful, a positive word
refl ecting a positive evaluation. However, the
entire second paragraph is devoted to examining
diff erences in pay scales that cannot be explained by
the human capital theory. Th e author’s positive view
of the theory is qualifi ed by the theory’s inability
to explain an important point.
A Correct. Th is statement refl ects the author’s
generally positive evaluation, as well as
concerns about insuffi ciencies.
B Th e author articulates the theory without
diffi culty and does not criticize it as diffi cult
to articulate.
C To substantiate the theory means to provide
evidence that verifi es the theory. Th e author
regards the theory’s explanations of high
concentration of women in certain
occupations as sound, and so is unlikely to
regard the theory as poorly substantiated.
D If the author regarded the theory as seriously
flawed, the passage would not describe it as
useful (see line 5).
E Th e author does not mention recent
research.
Th e correct answer is A.

我觉得注释写的很trick啊,我从全文看,感觉不出文章那么强烈的postive。我挺怕这类题目的,感觉无从下手啊。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-3-29 16:23:26 | 只看该作者
这题我开始也选的c,因为我开始觉得"plausible" is better than "well founded".其实这两个选项都不是绝对的positive or negative, but includes both of them. 作者并没有否定这个理论,第一段其实是作者客观的证明这个理论的优点,只不过文章后半段说的是这个理论未能解释的部分整体读完之后,会让人对后半段印象比较深刻,进而理解为作者对该理论持否定态度的结论。但其实再仔细看,两段内容其实是并列的,作者并没有因为后面不能解释的问题而否定了这个理论。只是说明它还不够完善。进而a选项还是较好的~~
不知道说明白了没~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-26 03:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部