- UID
- 614389
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Many researchers regardThailand’s recent economic growth, as reflected by its gross domestic product (GDP)growth rates, as an example ofthe success of a modern technological development strategy based on themarket economics of industrialized countries. Yet by focusingsolely on aggregate economic growth data as the measure of Thailand’sdevelopment, these researchers have overlooked the economic impact of rural development projects thatimprove people’s daily lives at the village level—such as the cooperativeraising of water buffalo, improved sanitation, and the development of foodcrops both for consumption and for sale at local markets; such projects are notadequately reflected in the country’s GDP. These researchers,influenced by Robert Heilbroner’s now outdated development theory, tend to view nontechnological developmentas an obstacle to progress. Heilbroner’s theory has become doctrine in someeconomics textbooks: for example, MontePalmer disparages nontechnological ruraldevelopment projects as inhibiting constructive change. Yet as Ann Kelleher’s two recent case studies of the Thai villages NonMuang and Dong Keng illustrate, the nontechnological-versus-technological dichotomy can lead researchers not only to overlookreal advances achieved by rural development projects but also mistakenly to concludethat because such advances are initiated by rural leaders and are based on traditionalvalues and practices, they retard “real” economic development.
GWD6-Q35:
Theprimary purpose of the passage is to
A. explainthe true reasons for the increase in Thailand’s GDP
B. arguefor the adoption of certain rural development projects
C. questionthe value of technological development in Thailand
D. criticizecertain assumptions about economic development in Thailand
E. comparetraditional and modern development strategies in Thailand
整篇文章的idea我觉得我没有捕捉好。
自己理解：
Many researchers: 觉得泰国经济好 success of modern tech development…
但是---只关注了GDP,忽略了rural development，which is not adequately 反映在GDP里
这些researchers：被RH的过时理论所影响，RH成了教条
但是： AK:将non-tech和tech development对立出来既忽视了rural development所带来的好处，又会错误的总结：因为advances是由rural development引发的且based on traditional values，就忽视real economic development。（就是说不重视rural和太重视rural都不行）
如果用一句话概括：就是先说tech development好，又说忽视了rural，又说忽视rural和过于rural都不行。是这样吗？
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD6-Q36:
Itcan be inferred from the passage that the term “real” in line 36 most likelyrefers to economic development that is
A. basedon a technological development strategy
B. notnecessarily favored by most researchers
1.A 是不是通过underlined那部分得出，与based on traditionalvalues and practices对应？
2. 觉得A说的非常小心，很像正确答案，又是not necessarily，又是not most的，感觉很包容，很像正确答案啊~
这两个问题，求解答……最近发的帖子都没人理……好伤心……
要是有筒子们知道链接给我发链接也行……第36题我是真没找到链接……
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-10-1 20:41:19
收藏
收藏
