gwd就缺5了,请大家帮忙看看,加点讨论

Maggiewjy · 发表于 2005-4-30 19:36:00

Q6:

According to the passage, much of the research on Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) supports which of the following conclusions?

Alessandra used her position as her sons’ sole guardian to further interests different from those of her sons.
Alessandra unwillingly sacrificed her own interests in favor of those of her sons.
Alessandra’s actions indicate that her motivations and intentions were those of an independent individual.
Alessandra’s social context encouraged her to take independent action.
Alessandra regarded her sons’ goals and interests as her own.

why no one chose D?

我开始也选了D但是再回文中定位时发现

yet much of the historian’s own
research reveals that Alessandra
acted primarily as a champion of her
(30) sons’ interests, taking their goals as
her own

由这句话推出选Ｅ不选D。

华籍美人 · 发表于 2005-5-25 10:35:00

22题的unexpected findings 其实就是原文二段首句的

it did not produce direct competitive advantages

for individual firms

二段首句的But 强转折关系引导文章的中心

fchn951 · 发表于 2005-6-16 13:58:00

22题C中的UEXPECTED FINDINGS 是指没想到的一个结果。本来是预期IT能大大提高生产率，可结果却是despite huge IT investments, most notably in the service sectors, productivity stagnated。生产率停滞不前。下面的文章就是要解释为什么会出现这样的productivity paradox。

esprit · 发表于 2005-9-5 10:49:00

Historians (who后面修饰Historians先跳过,等抓完文具结构再回头看是什么历史学家)who study European
women of the Renaissance try(抓到主要动辞尝试) to mea-
sure(原来是尝试衡量) “independence,” “options,” and
other indicators of the degree (衡量3种东西的程度)to which(受格关代-是哪3种呢?-独立,意见及个人疏发)
the expression of women’s individuality
was either permitted or suppressed.(看完6行原来只有一句话:研究文艺复兴的欧洲女人的历史学家尝试衡量上述三种程度)
Influenced by Western individualism(Dangling脱节句型:分辞开头,主辞在斗号后,是为了避免主辞重复的简洁句法),
these historians(主辞:历史学家) define(主要动辞:定义) a peculiar form
of personhood(定义了一种个人型式)(建议take note应该是主要考点) an innately bounded
unit, autonomous(要背:自治) and standing apart
from both nature and society(相当抽象,有概念就好-就是一个自主而独立于自然跟社会外的个体). An
anthropologist [I1] (秃然提到另一种人-预测必考对比差异), however(果然要代出差异点-要看清楚), would contend(=state=assert)
that a person can be conceived in ways(被以xx方式认知)
other than as an “individual.”(以非个人化认知-直接预测下文必只人被社会环境所影响) (下文若与预测相同直接跳过)In many
societies a person’s identity is not
intrinsically unique and self-contained
but instead(直接跳到这看被蛇么观念取代) is defined within a complex
web of social relationships(果然是社会关系,小弟直接跳到下一段)

看起来相当恐怖的18行文章若了解ETS计俩其实也就只有3句话,练多了自然有心理建设.
看完一段要知段落功能,功能就那几种:不是讲概念就是举例-讲出历史学家对个人的定义及另一派人类学家的看?k,并未举例.因此可预测下段必为举例部分.

In her study(修辞:代名词her无先行辞,判断可能是脱节句型,看主词有没有在斗号后面,没有就要往前找) of the fifteenth-century
Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi(原来是对F的寡妇的研究-开始举例), a
historian(就是本段开头的her,who先跳过,抓到全句架构再回头看她是谁) who specializes in European
women of the Renaissance attributes(抓到主要动辞attribute A to B把A归于B)
individual intention and authorship of
actions to her subject
(天哪~一下6行?!其实粉简单就一句话:一个历史学家在一个研究中研究了一个主题
这位专长于”文艺复兴欧洲女人”的历史学家在她对”15世纪F地的寡妇AS”的研究中将”个人动机与行为主导?吽坑k为她的研究主题). (开出了一个案例总不能没下文? 预测下面必是详细状况,快速瞄过抓出主旨)This historian(主辞,当然~不然还有谁)
assumes(主要动辞:假设) that(带出假设内容-要看清楚,一定跟另一派不同-关键考点) Alessandra had goals
and interests(A的目标跟兴趣) different from(与谁不同) those of her
sons(原来是跟小孩的不同), yet(转折,可预测必与假设相反,心中有预测后快速扫过是否与预测相同.若相同就跳过) much of the historian’s own
research(多半她的研究) reveals(主要动辞:揭露) that(带出揭露点-前已预测跟假设不同,看清楚如何不同?) Alessandra
acted(A实际行动如何?) primarily as a champion of her
sons’ interests, taking their goals as
her own(原来是把小孩们的兴趣跟目标当作自己的—跟原本历史学家认为只是独立的个人相左-反而与另依派人类学?a的说法吻合: 全文关键主旨). Thus(因此) Alessandra conforms
more closely(向xx接近) to the anthropologist’s
notion(果然没错: 接近人类学家说法人是社会环境的集合) that(已知主旨,后可快速扫过或跳过) personal motivation is
embedded in a social context. Indeed(忽然冒出一句不知是谁讲的:就是作者意见,可考态度题:作者赞同蛇么-赞同人类学家说人是社会集合),
one could argue that(有人会说xxx:作者自己预设反驳意见-表示作者赞同另一看法) Alessandra did
not distinguish her personhood from
that of her sons(有人会说A不把自己与小孩分开来看-事实上作者不以为然). In Renaissance
Europe(形容词词组补述后面主辞) the boundaries(主辞:xx的范围) of the con-
ceptual self(概念自我的范围) were not always(主要动辞:并不总是) firm
and closed(概念自我的范围并不总是固定而封闭) and(对等连接词带出平行定义) did not necessarily(也并不必然)
coincide(与xx巧合,交迭) with the boundaries of
the bodily self.(一下又来6行…好像很恐怖-其实还是粉简单)
(概念自我的范围并不总是固定而封闭,也并不必然与身体的自我交迭)

看完第二段自然知道段落功能-(一样不是解说概念就是举例)本段举例支持历史学家概念向人类学家概念靠拢(且作者认同)

全文主旨(就是贯串全文的主轴为何)-实例证实历史学家对个人的定义像人类学家说法(人是社会的宏)靠拢

戴维快乐阅读

vinlle · 发表于 2007-8-21 13:14:00

好牛啊，这篇短文看了几遍都看不懂，

我还是不知道最后一句是怎么来反驳倒数第二句的。。。

ilovecushi · 发表于 2007-10-3 02:37:00

今年已經是2007年了現在看GWD還有用嗎上場會碰到一樣的題目嘛?

我很努力的念GWD 但不知道是否真的有效...

哪位NN可以指教一下~

magicalkikyo · 发表于 2008-9-15 20:52:00

2008年我还在接着看咧~~~
看MM的回复像是台湾人，一搜果然是，呵呵~~~
bless~

magicalkikyo · 发表于 2008-9-15 21:01:00

哇，分析的太厉害了~~~

gwd就缺5了,请大家帮忙看看,加点讨论

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块