大全-2-5. The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction 权限of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering支付 operating costs with government funds. The statements above best support the conclusion that (A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry (B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs (C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs (D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm (E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs 答案为什么选B B和C好像意思差不多啊~~ 补充：选项E中"resign sb to doing sth" means make sb accept sth bad but can not change.
如果按C所说，那它比公共的系统就的优势就减少了，这是削弱。 thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.这是私人代替公共的一个好处，如果把funding给了私人，这个好处就不存在了。
如果按C所说，那它比公共的系统就的优势就减少了，这是削弱。 thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.这是私人代替公共的一个好处，如果把funding给了私人，这个好处就不存在了。
如果按C所说，那它比公共的系统就的优势就减少了，这是削弱。 thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.这是私人代替公共的一个好处，如果把funding给了私人，这个好处就不存在了。
City's public transportation should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost saving reduction in service.
PT handled by a private firm ---> profit will pursued ---> Not necessary for covering operating costs with government funds.
A. Could be true, could not be true.
B. so, apparently, based on the information offered, the reason why PT has to be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government is because we need to ensure it is politically " possible to raise fares " and " to institute cost - saving reduction in service.
In that sense, the assumption here is that private firm will be political possible to both raise fares and institute cost saving reduction in service.
C. The core of the argument is not about whether private firm could receive the public fund or not but about whether it could raise the profit to cover the operating cost without " compensating the public cost with government funds.
So, we need to ensure what is " sufficient conditions " that ensure private firm to boost up the profit.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-11-25 10:04:43
收藏
收藏
楼主
