ChaseDream
搜索
1234
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zcx
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教:og198

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2012-3-13 15:42:46 | 只看该作者

32#
发表于 2012-4-21 15:07:08 | 只看该作者
不好意思,才看到。
Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (it had had )for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
than有关系代词的性质,在比较分句中作宾语。本题的答案中省略了从句的主谓语。
-- by 会员 tianwan (2004/6/10 23:34:00)



这个是对的。 自己竟瞎说。
33#
发表于 2012-10-27 10:25:00 | 只看该作者
不好意思,才看到。
Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than (it had had )for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
than有关系代词的性质,在比较分句中作宾语。本题的答案中省略了从句的主谓语。
-- by 会员 tianwan (2004/6/10 23:34:00)




这个是对的。 自己竟瞎说。
-- by 会员 wangjieava23 (2012/4/21 15:07:08)


明白了明白了,than 做代词指代 supplies,  It had 因为跟后面主语的 it had 相同省略掉了,但我觉得这样的题考试时候根本想不到这一块啊,也只能通过其他的错误点来排了,
34#
发表于 2013-7-23 13:42:37 | 只看该作者
这句话就集中在原句究竟省略了什么。

看了全部回帖,感觉下面这种说法对。
with far more supplies than (it had had )

with决定了,还是比较主语,即比较army with far more supplies 和 (army with a few supplies) for any previous campaign.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 09:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部