ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1107|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一下

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-3 21:30:03 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
If the county continues to collect residential trash at current levels, landfills will soon be overflowing and parkland will need to be used in order to create more space. Charging each household a fee for each pound of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents to reduce the amount of trash they create; this charge will therefore protect the remaining county parkland.
大意是说如果城市按现在收集居民垃圾的水平,垃圾填埋厂很快就溢出来了公园用地就要被用做更多的填埋厂。每家收垃圾排放费会使居民减少垃圾排放。使得公园用地保留。是这样吗?
觉得E选项比较像耶


Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?



(a)   Residents will reduce the amount of trash they put out for collection by reducing the number of products they buy.


(b)   The collection fee will not significantly affect the purchasing power of most residents, even if their households do not reduce the amount of trash they put out.

(c)   The collection fee will not induce residents to dump their trash in the parklands illegally.为啥选C啊
(d)  The beauty of county parkland is an important issue for most of the county’s residents.

(e)   Landfills outside the county’s borders could be used as dumping sites for the county’s trash.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-21 07:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部