LSAT-3-1-21 先多谢NN赐教

21.   edr Unlike cloth diapers, disposable diapers are a threat to the environment. Sixteen billion disposable diapers are discarded annually, filling up landfills at an alarming rate. So people must stop buying disposable diapers and use cloth diapers.

Maria: But you forget that cloth diapers must be washed in hot water, which requires energy. Moreover, the resulting wastewater pollutes our rivers. When families use diaper services, diapers must be delivered by fuel-burning trucks that pollute the air and add to traffic congestion.

Maria objects to Pedro’s argument by

(A) claiming that Pedro overstates the negative evidence about disposable diapers in the course of his argument in favor of cloth diapers

(B) indicating that Pedro draws a hasty conclusion, based on inadequate evidence about cloth diapers

(C) pointing out that there is an ambiguous use of the word “disposable” in Pedro’s argument

(D) demonstrating that cloth diapers are a far more serious threat to the environment than disposable diapers are（B）

(E) suggesting that the economic advantages of cloth diapers outweigh whatever environmental damage they may cause

大全给的答案是B，不过我觉得pedro在自己的话里丝毫没有提及evidence about cloth diapers（只是指出了disposable diapers的坏处），认为D更好些，请NN指正

But B seems very vague by using "inadequate evidence about cloth diapers". B doesn't mention in which aspect the evidence about the cloth diapers is inadequate. The focus of arguement is on the environmental threat of the use of disposable diapers and that of the use of cloth diapers. Only D mentions the threat of both disposable diapers and cloth diapers. I think D is right.

B是正确的，这种推理方法题的答案大多较抽象。

1。P只考虑cloth diapers不用扔掉便下结论说cloth diapers对环境没THREAT。M指出cloth diapers也会对环境构成THREAT，即P没有充分考虑cloth diapers的其他情况便下结论，当然是hasty conclusion，证据也不充分。

2。原文找不到任何cloth diapers和disposable diapers 哪个对环境THREAT大的证据，故D不是答案。