ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1430|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]关于RC JJ AFL 公会那篇GWD原文 请同学们帮助解答下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-2 16:56:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]关于RC JJ AFL 公会那篇GWD原文 请同学们帮助解答下

JJ里就这一篇是原文的,不过兴奋地读了好几遍还是没有彻底的明白 感觉自己的逻辑架构乱乱的

In 1938, at the government-convened National Health Conference, organized labor emerged as a major proponent of legislation to guarantee universal health care in the United States.  The American Medical Association, representing physicians’ interests, argued for preserving physicians’ free-market prerogatives.  Labor activists countered these arguments by insisting that health care was a fundamental right that should be guaranteed by government programs. (第一段的意图不知道是什么,提到的两个组织NHCAMA下文都没出现,我想大概的意思应该就是像这一类组织协会啥的都比较偏袒employer labor activist 就比较保护工人。)

      The labor activists’ position represented a departure from the voluntarist view held until 1935 by leaders of the American Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affiliation of labor unions说是在1935年前和AFLleaders 的立场是背离的; the voluntarist view stressed workers’ right to freedom from government intrusions into their lives and represented national health insurance as a threat to workers’ privacy AFL的人的态度是觉得国家健康险是对工人隐私的一种侵犯.  AFL president Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for all workers, had positioned the AFL as a leading opponent of the proposals for national health insurance that were advocated beginning in 1915 by the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL), an organization dedicated to the study and reform of labor laws.(说G 的起点是为广大工人着想
  
他把AFL视为反对AFLL的头号反对者
  
Gompers’ opposition to national health insurance was partly principled, arising from the premise that governments under capitalism invariably served employers’, not workers’, interests. Gompers feared the probing of government bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as the possibility that government-mandated health insurance, financed in part by employers, could permit companies to require employee medical examinations that might be used to discharge disabled workers. G反对的理由云云

      Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions:  the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers.  AFL 的人也妥协了一些事情
  
比如政府对于童工和受伤工人的干预)
   AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power.

  
不知道这句是什么意思
  
insurance 这个地方画条线?out of concern their power 是什么意思?)The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers.这句话没谓语么  That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable. 说这句话的跟据是什么。
   Reform
指的是什么
  
是指AFL的人妥协么
  

      Indeed, the AFL leadership did face serious organizational divisions.  Many unionists, recognizing that union-run health programs covered only a small fraction of union members and that unions represented only a fraction of the nation’s workforce, worked to enact compulsory health insurance in their state legislatures.  最后AFL出现了分歧 有些人发现工会的健康项目只包含了少数人群 而且工会本身就代表了少数工人 最后开始去支持强制健康险的法案This activism and the views underlying it came to prevail in the United States labor movement and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed its position on health legislation.这个观点
  
最后占了主流
  
然后在1935 年的时候AFL明确地改变的自己在health legislation 的立场。
  
1935年前AFL的立场到底是啥
  
1935G不是才上台么。怎么整了这么多最后又回到了1935年。

不明白的是

1 第二段明明说了说1935年前 labor activists AFL的人立场背离,又说1935年前 AFL的人反对
  
健康险,后面也说了G同学
  
也反对
  
健康险,并且把AFL作为反对AFLL的头号opponent
  
那到底labor activists对健康险是个什么态度
  
支持or 反对?

2 是不是由于
  
第三段对于AFL的一些人的妥协:the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers. G
  
立场变得objectionable

3 说到最后又回到35
   
那是不是G同学本来就是在 35年前当的
   
官?

打着打着 觉得自己有点懂了 我是这么想的  G 应该就是在35年前当的官,这通篇都讲的事35年前的事。最后G的观点被人摒弃了,然后失败了。LA的立场是支持健康险。

 不知道对不对,大家确认下。哪位同学能画个逻辑简图最好。

 不知道对不对,大家确认下。哪位同学能画个逻辑简图最好。

 不知道对不对,大家确认下。哪位同学能画个逻辑简图最好。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/3 11:03:27编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-3 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
UP,每次发帖都没人理我...RP太差了。
板凳
发表于 2009-8-3 12:46:00 | 只看该作者

看看这个,不知道有用没,我是借花献佛,谢谢翻译提供者

1.        GWD-17-Q24-Q27 AFL对政府医疗保障的态度

      In 1938, at the government-convened   1938年的会议上工会工人

       National Health Conference, organized labor      是提议立法保障公众健康

       emerged as a major proponent of legislation       的主要力量。

Line       to guarantee universal health care in the

  (5)      United States.  The American Medical       代表医师利益的AMM

Association, representing physicians’         求保护医师的自由市场权。

interests, argued for preserving physicians’

free-market prerogatives.  Labor activists      劳工行动家反对他们,坚

countered these arguments by insisting that     持说卫生保健是由政府项

 (10)      health care was a fundamental right that       目保障的基本权利。

should be guaranteed by government

programs. 1938年, labor activists支持政府医疗保障

      The labor activists’ position represented
                
劳工行动家的立场背离了

a departure from the voluntarist view held     AFL1935年才放弃的

 (15)      until 1935 by leaders of the American        唯意志观点。

Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affili-

ation of labor unions; the voluntarist view      唯意志观点强调工人有权

stressed workers’ right to freedom from        摆脱政府对自己生活的干

government intrusions into their lives and       扰,它认为健康保险危及

 (20)      represented national health insurance as a      公众隐私。

       threat to workers’ privacy.  AFL president       AFL领袖SG肆意说代表了

       Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for         全体工人,反对AALL

all workers, had positioned the AFL as         1915年设立健康保险的提

a leading opponent of the proposals for         议。

 (25)      national health insurance that were advo-

cated beginning in 1915 by the American

Association for Labor Legislation (AALL),

an organization dedicated to the study and

reform of labor laws.  Gompers’ opposition    SG的反对一定程度上有他

 (30)      to national health insurance was partly        的原则,基于资本主义政

principled, arising from the premise that        府总是保护雇主的利益。

governments under capitalism invariably

       served employers’, not workers’, interests.

Gompers feared the probing of government     SG害怕官僚主义伸入工人

 (35)
                       bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as
    
生活,由雇主资助的保险

the possibility that government-mandated      又可能让公司得到员工的

health insurance, financed in part by           体检报告,用来辞退伤残

employers, could permit companies to         工人。

      require employee medical examinations

 (40)     that might be used to discharge disabled

workers. 1935年之前AFL的主要观点,反对政府医疗保障

      Yet
                    the AFL’s voluntarism had accom-
  
但唯意志论容纳了某些例

modated certain exceptions:  the AFL had      外:AFL支持代表受伤工

supported government intervention on behalf     人和童工的政府干预。

 (45)      of injured workers and child laborers.  AFL    AFL和健康保险划清界

officials drew the line at national health          线,一部分是出于自身权

insurance, however, partly out of concern         力的考虑。

for their own power.  The fact that AFL         AALL等局外人担当主

outsiders such as the AALL had taken the        要角色惹怒了SG

 (50)      most prominent advocacy roles antagonized

Gompers.  That this reform threatened union-    这个改革危及SG支持的

sponsored benefit programs championed by       资助利益项目,让保险

Gompers made national health insurance         更讨厌。

even more objectionable.

 (55)            Indeed, the AFL leadership did face      AFL的领导层的确面临

serious organizational divisions.  Many         严重分化。很多联盟成员

unionists, recognizing that union-run health      认识到联盟运作的健康项

programs covered only a small fraction of        目只面对一小部分成员,

union members and that unions represented       纷纷支持义务健康保险。

 (60)      only a fraction of the nation’s workforce,

worked to enact compulsory health

insurance in their state legislatures.  This        最终在1935AFL还是

activism and the views underlying it came to      支持了这一立法。

prevail in the United States labor movement

 (65)      and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed

its position on health legislationAFL最终倒戈支持政府医疗保证.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-3 20:23:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上的~~
5#
发表于 2009-8-7 20:46:00 | 只看该作者

翻得真好,本来有几句话一直读不懂很不爽,顶

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-5 10:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部