ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1800|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-4-3-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-3 15:15:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-4-3-5



5.     Animals with a certain behavioral disorder have unusually high level of aluminum in their brain tissue. Since a silicon-based compound binds to aluminum and prevents it from affecting the brain tissue. Animals can be cured of the disorder by being treated with the compound.

The argument is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Animals with the disorder have unusually high but invariable levels of aluminum in their brain tissue.

(B) Aluminum is the cause of the disorder rather than merely an effect of it.

(C) Introducing the compound into the brain tissue has no side effects.

(D) The amount of the compound needed to neutralize the aluminum in an animal’s brain tissue varies depending upon the species.(B)

(E) Aluminum is never present in normal brain tissue.

我觉得b,和c都是这道题的assumption呀,麻烦大家指点一下c为什么不对呢?

谢谢!


沙发
发表于 2004-3-3 16:07:00 | 只看该作者
C不是前提。C可以作为一个支持结论的答案。要注意区分前提和支持的选项。方法是取非,前提取非后,结论瓦解。支持取非不能导致结论瓦解。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-4 13:55:00 | 只看该作者
哦,感谢dansy, 我大致领悟了,not+weaken思路


如果对c取非,就说coumpoud 有side effect, 也对结论有weaken作用,但不能瓦解结论,所以不正确对吧。好像是个程度的问题,


体会中。。。


谢谢,我以前做题好像没太注意

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-16 11:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部