大全-1-1

Snazzy · 发表于 2004-2-12 04:47:00

1. The excessive number of safety regulation that the federal government has placed on industry poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones. Since large companies do everything on a more massive scale, they must alter more complex operations and spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.
Which of the following , if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Small companies are less likely than large companies to have the capital reserves for improvements.
(B) The operation codes are uniform, established without reference to size of company.
(C) Safety regulation codes are uniform, established without reference to size of company.
(D) Large companies typically have more of their profits invested in other businesses than do small companies.
(E) Large companies are in general more likely than small companies to diversify the markets and products.

A, but it is very reluctant. thanks

番茄炒蛋 · 发表于 2004-2-12 12:37:00

这题感觉没有什么太大问题
因为作为削弱就应该是找出一个原因来说明原文中的结果是如何发生的
而这个原因最好就是和原文没有什么直接联系但又要能够解释原文
a中的解释是可以被接受的

amo · 发表于 2004-2-13 21:37:00

我觉得结论说大公司比小公司更困难，要反对结论就说小公司比大公司更困难，A就是这样的答案。

caterpillar · 发表于 2004-2-16 06:36:00

个人感觉答案确实有点牵强。原文说safety regulation 给大企业带来了更多的困难，而答案在说：大企业有更多的资金储备，只能说明大企业有实力解决这些困难。

大全-1-1

大全-1-1

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块