ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1329|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PP1*essey17--請XDJM幫忙解答

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-4 15:46:00 | 只看该作者

PP1*essey17--請XDJM幫忙解答

Many people believe that because wages are lower in developing countries than in developed countries, competition from developing countries in goods traded internationally will soon eliminate large numbers of jobs in developed countries.  Currently, developed countries' advanced technology results in higher productivity, which accounts for their higher wages.  Advanced technology is being transferred ever more speedily across borders, but even with the latest technology, productivity and wages in developing countries will remain lower than in developed countries for many years because developed countries have better infrastructure and better-educated workers.  When productivity in a developing country does catch up, experience suggests that wages there will rise.  Some individual firms in developing countries have raised their productivity but kept their wages (which are influenced by average productivity in the country's economy) low.  However, in a developing country's economy as a whole, productivity improvements in goods traded internationally are likely to cause an increase in wages.  Furthermore, if wages are not allowed to rise, the value of the country's currency will appreciate, which (from the developed countries' point of view) is the equivalent of increased wages in the developing country.  And although in the past a few countries have deliberately kept their currencies undervalued, that is now much harder to do in a world where capital moves more freely. 

The passage suggests that if the movement of capital in the world were restricted, which of the following would be likely?

(A) Advanced technology could move more quickly from developed countries to developing countries.

(B) Developed countries could compete more effectively for jobs with developing countries.

(C) A country's average wages could increase without significantly increasing the sophistication of its technology or the value of its currency.

(D) A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.

(E) Workers could obtain higher wages by increasing their productivity.

D是正確答案:但我不太懂,本文提到的薪資並未上漲原因中,其一是貨幣升值,那麼如果capital movement被restricted,貨幣被undervalue的結果不就是要讓薪資上漲嗎????


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-4 16:10:26编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-10-4 19:30:00 | 只看该作者

这是一道取非题

if wages are not allowed to rise, the value of the country's currency will appreciate

工资不长,货币升值,相对于工资上涨

And although in the past a few countries have deliberately kept their currencies undervalued, that is now much harder to do in a world where capital moves more freely. 

资本不能自由流动,国家可以故意使货币低于实际价值;当资本可以流动,工资就要涨啦!

capital movement被restricted,貨幣被undervalue,就没有薪資上漲,在看看题目,偶说的对不

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-4 23:30:00 | 只看该作者
恩恩,但是E選項講的不就是這個意思嗎?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-28 05:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部