ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2369|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求 6-18 supporters

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-31 09:27:00 | 只看该作者

求 6-18 supporters

18. The value of a product is determined by the ratio of its quality to its price. The higher the value of a product, the better will be its competitive position. Therefore, either increasing the quality or lowering the price of a given product will increase the likelihood that consumer will select that product rather than a competing one.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn above?

(A) It is possible to increase both the quality and the price of a product without changing its competitive position.
(B) For certain segments of the population of consumers, higher-priced brands of some product lines are preferred to the lower-priced brands.
(C) Competing products often try to appeal to different segments of the population of consumers.
(D) The competitive position of a product can be affected by such factors as advertising and brand loyalty.
(E) Consumers’ perceptions of the quality of a product are based on the actual quality of the product.

The given answer is E, which WAS also my first choice.  However, after reading it over, I tend to go for A instead.  The stem is primarily focused on the concept of "ratio", not just the 分子 or 分母.  The example provided also strengthens this concept.  Hence, I believe A is a better choice becuase it aligns better with the idea of "ratio".  Choice E actually contradicts with author's orginal argument becuase it implicitly excludes price when dicussion about the determinantor of "perceptions of the quality"

Can someone comment?  Never thought I would stuck with a CR question before ...
Really appreciate it.  







[此贴子已经被作者于2003-12-31 9:32:19编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2003-12-31 11:54:00 | 只看该作者
这道题我认为是E。你形容的在做题中的问题最近我也有,本来选对了可有分析觉得有问题,我想可能是陷进去复杂的逻辑推理和想象的原因,有种进去出不来的感觉;
A是可能的,但不是加强,A 说有可能质量上升并同时价格上升不改变竞争优势。这是原文结论的一部分,或是包括在原文中。
而E 才是加强,Consumers’ perceptions of the quality of a product are based on the actual quality of the product。E 如果不满足,原文推理就一定有问题。
A 是一种有迷惑性的伎俩。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-31 12:13:00 | 只看该作者
I guess when you are struggling and hesitating, you will get a slightly better chance to go for the one first catches your eye.  

Though your answer still hasn't clear all my doubt yet, I am a little more convinced.  I hope there are more people to challenge me as I believe truth lies in the majority. :->
多谢指点, qww 兄。
地板
发表于 2003-12-31 14:56:00 | 只看该作者
同意qww, 只有E才起到加强作用。 A是对的,但是没有加强作用,只是原文重述。
5#
发表于 2004-1-4 22:08:00 | 只看该作者
A is clearly wrong. Because if both quality and price rise, the ratio is uncertain. It could rise or drop.
6#
发表于 2004-1-5 12:16:00 | 只看该作者
increasing the quality 必须是能够让顾客感受的到的increase
如果这种质量的提高顾客感受不到,那么这种商品的性价比还是不会得到提高的
这种逻辑有些酒香还怕巷子深的道理,如果你的变化不能让别人知道酒没有什么用处
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-6 09:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部