ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2410|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-两道题请问!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-17 08:08:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-两道题请问!


22.    All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very nearsighted. So I must be a genius.
Which one of the following exhibits both of the logical flaws exhibited in the argument above?
(A) I must be stupid because all intelligent people are nearsighted and I have perfect eyesight.
(B) All chickens have beaks. This bird has a beak. So this bird must be a chicken.
(C) All pigs have four legs, but this spider has eight legs. So this spider must be twice as big as any pig.
(D) John is extremely happy, so he must be extremely tall because all tall people are happy.
(E) All geniuses are very nearsighted. I must be very nearsighted since I am a genius.

B很合文中的逻辑,可答案是D!请解释一下!

12.    “Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.”
Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor’s second reason does not cancel out the first?
(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient’s records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.
(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor’s office staff.
(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.
(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.
(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors’ patients took no advantage of this policy.

 答案是A,没想明白,谁能解释和翻译一下么?多谢。

沙发
发表于 2003-12-17 12:48:00 | 只看该作者
22。B表面上符合但仔细分析有这样的不同:比较的对象一个是All chickens ,一个是bird属不同类别的比较。而题是有从属关系的同类比较 All intelligent peop,和 I。
板凳
发表于 2003-12-17 21:53:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得22道题目中:问题问的两个flaws!
其中:B只有其中一个flaws类似

而原文中另外一个flaws是very --> genius
既:作者假设了这是一种正比关系!
    越近视人越聪明!

B中没有这个logical flaw,
而D中有:
注意extremely这个单词!

所以,我觉得D比B更为妥当!
地板
发表于 2003-12-17 22:09:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用八戒在2003-12-17 21:53:00的发言:
我觉得22道题目中:问题问的两个flaws!
其中:B只有其中一个flaws类似

而原文中另外一个flaws是very --> genius
既:作者假设了这是一种正比关系!
     越近视人越聪明!

B中没有这个logical flaw,
而D中有:
注意extremely这个单词!

所以,我觉得D比B更为妥当!


上面八戒分析的更有道理,支持!!
5#
发表于 2003-12-17 22:44:00 | 只看该作者
12。 尽管病人很快将可以,但我认为病人不应该有权利看他们的医疗记录。作为一个医生,我对此有两个理由, First, 给病人此权利将是一种时间的浪费,因为它大大减少了 medical staff 能用在更重要事情上的时间,而通过要求他们重新拿取和存放档案,Second, 如果依照我的经验, 没有病人将要求获得他们的医疗记录。
Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor’s second reason does not cancel out the first?
关键的问题如何翻译准确,我也不清楚,抱歉。
6#
发表于 2003-12-17 23:11:00 | 只看该作者
12道题目以前讨论过:
我搜索了一下(楼主也可以这么做:比如这道题目是LSAT section2 IV ,你可以在搜索中输入“LSAT 2 12”,很快就可以找到了!)

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&replyID=190203&ID=25951&skin=1

感觉是一道解释题:
我自己这么理解的:cancel out 有一个work against的意思
也就是解释为什么第二个理由和第一个理由不自相矛盾!
第一个理由说:浪费时间
第二个理由说:根绝我的经验,根本没有病人要求看
有个矛盾就是:既然没有病人要求看病历,作者又如何知道病人如果要求看病历会浪费时间呢?
A可以解释这个矛盾!

这是我自己的理解,好象和以前其他牛牛分析得不大一样呀!
不过,我想思路还是没有错,就是解释矛盾。

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-18 01:03:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢诸位大虾!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-19 01:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部