LSAT5/Sec4/Q20请教逻辑高手

mzyzhu · 发表于 2003-4-26 17:44:00

[face=Arial]Politician: Homelessness is a serious social problem, but further government spending to provide low-income housing is not the cure for homelessness. The most cursory glance at the real-estate section of any major newspaper is enough to show that there is no lack of housing units available to rent. So the frequent claim that people are homeless because of a lack of available housing is wrong.

That homelessness is a serious social problem figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?
(B) It sets out a problem the argument is designed to resolve.
(C) It is compatible either with accepting the conclusion or with denying it.

The answer is C. but Why B is wrong?

The politician admits homeless is a serious problem but had a different view on how to resolve the problem. Traditionalists propose government spending for “low-income” housing, however, the politician in question argues such efforts will be in vain because houses available for rent are abundant.

It is obvious that the politician has changed the notion from low-income house to market-available house, which is much expensive for low-income households.

In my perspective, the politician is arguing a different measure to resolve the question. That is what answer B says.

[/face]

nobody · 发表于 2003-4-26 18:49:00

resolve用错了，如果改成refute，B或许可作为答案。Here, politician doesnot offer any advice.

个人愚见，请大家补充。

cranberry · 发表于 2003-4-26 22:28:00

c means that no matter the conclusion is accepted or not,the fact that homslessness is a serious social problem is true.

争论没有触及这个问题存在与否，而是对问题的原因提出了不同的解释

renprince · 发表于 2003-5-2 19:08:00

homeless becomes a serious social problem because of c,accepting the conclusion that the government does not need to provide housing or denying the conclusion both can not solve the problem.

zxppx · 发表于 2013-5-30 19:36:10

20. Politician: Homelessness is a serious social problem, but（后面是主要结论） further government spending to provide low-income housing is not the cure for homelessness.无家可归是一个严重的问题，但是政府提供低价房不是解决之道 The most cursory glance at the real-estate section of any major newspaper is enough to show that there is no lack of housing units available to rent. So （次要结论）the frequent claim that people are homeless because of a lack of available housing is wrong.进一步说明为什么增加房屋供给不是解决之道
That homelessness is a serious social problem figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?
(A) It suggests an alternative prospective to the one adopted in the argument.
文中没有提到an alternative
(B) It sets out a problem the argument is designed to resolve.
文中讨论的是问题是：government provide low-income housing 是否是解决之道
(C) It is compatible either with accepting the conclusion or with denying it.
无论这个结论是否成立，第一句话都是能成立的。文中其他的话与这句话无关
(D) It summarizes a position the argument as a whole is directed toward discrediting.（C）
(E) It is required in order to establish the conclusion.
http://www.manhattanlsat.com/forums/q20-politician-homelessness-is-a-serious-t1881.html

LSAT5/Sec4/Q20请教逻辑高手

LSAT5/Sec4/Q20请教逻辑高手

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块