ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1026|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

pp-1最后一篇阅读

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-11 13:20:00 | 只看该作者

pp-1最后一篇阅读

Essay #18.  560    (23993-!-item-!-188;#058&00560-00)

 

A recent study has provided clues to predator-prey dynamics in the late Pleistocene era.  Researchers compared the number of tooth fractures in present-day carnivores with tooth fractures in carnivores that lived 36,000 to 10,000 years ago and that were preserved in the Rancho La Brea tar pits in Los Angeles.  The breakage frequencies in the extinct species were strikingly higher than those in the present-day species.

 

In considering possible explanations for this finding, the researchers dismissed demographic bias because older individuals were not overrepresented in the fossil samples.  They rejected preservational bias because a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits.  They ruled out local bias because breakage data obtained from other Pleistocene sites were similar to the La Brea data.  The explanation they consider most plausible is behavioral differences between extinct and present-day carnivores--in particular, more contact between the teeth of predators and the bones of prey due to more thorough consumption of carcasses by the extinct species.  Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.

 

Question #59.  560-01  (24039-!-item-!-188;#058&000560-01)

 

The primary purpose of the passage is to

 

(A)   present several explanations for a well-known fact

Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.

 

(B) suggest alternative methods for resolving a debate

(C) argue in favor of a controversial theory

(D) question the methodology used in a study

(E) discuss the implications of a research finding

答案是E,但是我的选择是A,我的理解是对古代食肉动物牙齿损坏高这种well-known fact,给出了either。。。。or这2种解释,有NN能帮我解释一下我的理解错在哪里了吗?谢谢了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-6 16:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部