GWD3-Q32,please...only 10 days last

GWD3-Q32:

Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

1. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
2. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
3. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
4. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
5. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

答案是A，百思不得其解。我还有10天考GMAT，还有救么？Please...

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=58525

有讨论，挺多的，你自己看看吧，答案在A和C上有争议，我还是觉得A要好些

个人理解:政府本来是认为没有教育会犯罪率少的，但是实际上没有教育的人并没有减少犯罪，所以显得有教育的人犯罪率低很奇怪，恰好和它的本意相反。所以就是说有一个隐含的条件就是政府的设想目的没有达到，也就是说没有接受教育的并没有减少犯罪。

也就是A选项比较好一些.这仅是一点个人拙见!

答案是C。

原文的意思是：读书可以帮助降低犯罪率。

问假设，可以用取非来看，取非削弱原文即是答案。

A的取非：不读书的话可以抵制犯罪，支持原文，不是答案。

C的取非：读书的人在读书之前和不读书的人一样容易犯罪，也就是读书没用，削弱原文。