ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2323|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

14-4-12

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-24 12:46:00 | 只看该作者

14-4-12

14-4-12
Beverage company representative: the plastic rings that hold six-packs

of beverage cans together pose a threat to wild animals, which often

become entangled in the discarded rings and suffocate as a result.

Following our lead, all beverage companies will soon use only those

ring consisting of a new plastic that disintegrates after only three

days' exposure to sunlight. Once we all complete the switchover from

the old to the new plastic rings, therefore, the threat of suffocation

that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated.

12. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the

representative's argument?

(A) The switchover to the new plastic rings will take at least two more

years to complete

(B) After the beverage companies have switched over to the new plastic

rings, a substantial number of the old plastic rings will persist in

most aquatic and woodland environments

(C) The new plastic rings are slightly less expensive than the old

rings

(D) The new plastic rings rarely disintegrate during shipping of

beverage six-packs because most trucks that transport canned beverages

protect their cargo from sunlight

(E) The new plastic rings disintegrate into substances that are harmful

to aquatic animals when ingested in substantial quantities by them

答案选b,可我认为B不足以作为一个削弱选项
因为实际上新的塑料拉环的确是可以减少威胁的,虽然有老的在那里不能分解掉

,可是由于新出来的拉环都是可以分解的,所以总的威胁还是少了很多。所以我

认为B只是一个陈述,不是一个削弱
沙发
发表于 2003-11-25 15:39:00 | 只看该作者
the key word is "eliminated"

that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated

Once there are old plastics persist, the introduction of new ones can not be said to eliminate dangers.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-26 00:18:00 | 只看该作者
我的理解是这样的
总的威胁等于原先的威胁加上新的威胁
那么在用新的拉环之后呢总的威胁只是原先的那些威胁了
如果不用新的拉环,那么总的威胁就是原来的威胁加上继续用老拉环的那些威胁
这样看来用新的拉环不是减少了总的威胁吗
小MY再帮我看看
地板
发表于 2003-11-26 04:13:00 | 只看该作者
晕,番茄,你仔细看看那人的意思是说完全没有危害。
那老的拉环不是还在嘛,怎么能没威胁呢。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-27 16:07:00 | 只看该作者
呼呼,真是不行了
eliminate都不知道什么意思了,活不下去了
我还把它当作减少的意思呢,昏倒
谢谢两位了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-19 12:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部