ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: bejiao
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-16-16

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2009-8-24 01:36:00 | 只看该作者

14楼显然错误,16楼正解。

but thanks to both.

22#
发表于 2009-8-24 17:20:00 | 只看该作者

这道题的key是price

要证明是flawed就要证明是price导致的

查看几个选项

明显是B涉及到了price

迅速选出

23#
发表于 2009-10-19 14:01:00 | 只看该作者
A选项的不对之处在于:题干中提出的范围是在retail market中对small firms 和superstores进行比较。而A中说larger customers不参与retail market。和题目讨论的范围不同,所以是无关选项。
24#
发表于 2009-10-19 16:33:00 | 只看该作者
我的理解是虽然since even today the superstores control a very small share of the retail market.但是B说导致了由于自己价格过于廉价导致整个市场恶性降价 ,破坏了市场规律 这样就说明确实 has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstores
25#
发表于 2009-11-19 23:49:49 | 只看该作者
16. The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstores” whose high sales volume keeps their prices low. This analysis is flawed, however, since even today the superstores control a very small share of the retail market.

  Which of the following, if true, would most weaken
  the argument that the analysis is flawed?
  (A) Most of the larger customers for office
      equipment purchase under contract directly
      from manufacturers and thus do not participate
      in the retail market.
  (B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low
      prices has forced prices down throughout the
      retail market for office supplies.
  (C) Some of the superstores that only recently
      opened have themselves gone out of business.
  (D) Most of the office equipment superstores are
      owned by large retailing chains that also own
      stores selling other types of goods.
  (E) The growing importance of computers in most
      offices has changed the kind of office
      equipment retailers must stock.
这道题的答案是B,但是我觉得B并没有反对the argument that the analysis is flawed。
只是加强了前半部分的论述。但是其他的选项应该也都不对。请指教阿

-- by 会员 bejiao (2003/10/11 19:53:00)



这题A有迷惑性!

题目问那个最能削弱文中的反驳

文中反驳的立场是:superstore占领的市场很少,进一步反对文中的superstore的价格低

反驳有两种办法:

1, superstore占领的市场不少.

2,superstore的价格确实低.

A说明了很多大客户都是直接从厂商购买的,貌似好像支持了superstore的市场占有率达,其实无关(thus do not participate
      in the retail market.
),且我们并不能从A推出任何和价格有关的信息!

B说明了第二点:价格确实低! 为答案
26#
发表于 2012-1-16 15:55:23 | 只看该作者
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstores” whose high sales volume keeps their prices low. This analysis is flawed(Conclusion), however, since even today the superstores control a very small share of the retail market(Premise).
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument that the analysis is flawed?

(A) Most of the larger customers for office equipment purchase under contract directly from manufacturers and thus do not participate in the retail market.(既然没有参与零售市场,就是无关选项)


(B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.superstores的广告对零售产业产生了影响)


(C) Some of the superstores that only recently opened have themselves gone out of business.(superstores自行退出竞争跟有没有影响是两码子事情)


(D) Most of the office equipment superstores are owned by large retailing chains that also own stores selling other types of goods.(有没有卖其他的东西跟有没有影响无关)


(E) The growing importance of computers in most offices has changed the kind of office equipment retailers must stock.(还是没有提到影响的问题)

Analysis:最近办公设备零售产业的变动主要归因于"能以量制价的superstores"的出现
Argument:Analysis是错的(superstores对零售产业有影响),因为superstores的市场份额小
Weaken:即使份额小,仍会有影响
27#
发表于 2012-6-26 10:47:56 | 只看该作者
@ wildmantomba
你的帖子才是又简洁又易懂 瞬间明朗!
谢谢
28#
发表于 2012-10-10 15:24:42 | 只看该作者
wildmantomba  THANK U
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-15 11:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部