ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2741|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 8.12 线下 JJ

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2020-8-13 11:20:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
收藏收藏2 收藏收藏2
沙发
发表于 2020-8-13 12:46:16 | 只看该作者
是原文吗?

The Mission Inn in Riverside, California, is a luxury hotel constructed in 1902 to evoke "the Old California of missions and ranchos," according to its promotional pamphlet. Consistent with this image, the builders filled an entire city block with arches, bell towers, flying buttresses, domes, fountains, wrought-iron balconies, and Tiffany stained-glass windows. An ornate, turn-of-the-century fantasy of Hispanic architecture, the Inn is completely unlike the unornamented adobe structures that existed in the Southwest before the Americans came.

Similarly, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century state courts developed elaborate theories of water rights ostensibly based on Hispanic law, but which bore no resemblance to actual Spanish and Mexican legal traditions. Despite their awareness of the historical reality of communal water-sharing practices, American judges asserted that municipal and riparian water rights originating in the Hispanic period were absolute and exclusive.' These doctrines of absolute water rights, legitimated water monopoly and accumulation in the hands of a few cities and landowners. In some states, this version of Hispanic law persists: in 1975, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed Los Angeles's paramount "pueblo water right" to its local watershed on the basis of stare decisis, despite extensive trial court findings that the right had no historical basis.'

In contrast to the common law water regime of riparian and prior appropriation rights emphasizing individual property interests, a communal water system prevailed in the Hispanic Southwest. Legal historians of the Spanish and Mexican periods have shown that far from being absolute and exclusive, water rights were shared between municipalities and other users, especially in times of shortage. This communal water system also restricted the private sector, for riparian owners did not automatically have the right to irrigate their own property, but needed an express or implied grant of water in addition to land. These communal water use patterns can be traced back to regional sharing arrangements in medieval Spain and are still practiced in parts of the contemporary Southwest. Based on this historical evidence, many scholars of western water law in the American period have criticized nineteenth- and twentieth-century state courts for distorting Hispanic traditions. However, the legal historians who have attempted to explain this distortion have attributed it to a judicial "loss of Hispanic learning" or to parties failing to present documents on Spanish and Mexican water law to the courts. None of these scholars has examined the contemporary background of the key nineteenth- and early twentieth century cases to evaluate the context of these decisions, and none has researched court files to determine the extent to which judges knowingly misused Hispanic law.


板凳
发表于 2020-8-13 17:58:16 | 只看该作者
妈呀 请问是吗
地板
发表于 2020-8-14 19:30:44 | 只看该作者
3. 这题选I, II
PS:10000^100次方问下列哪个数和它相等?
I. 100^200
II. 10^400
III. (100^100)(100^100)

想问下 这道题 难道不选III嘛?
5#
发表于 2020-8-14 23:18:47 | 只看该作者
bzy! 发表于 2020-8-13 12:46
是原文吗?

The Mission Inn in Riverside, California, is a luxury hotel constructed in 1902 to evoke ...

看别人的jj应该是这篇了。好奇你是怎么找到的
6#
发表于 2020-8-14 23:41:49 | 只看该作者
bzy! 发表于 2020-8-13 12:46
是原文吗?

The Mission Inn in Riverside, California, is a luxury hotel constructed in 1902 to evoke ...

内容差不多,但是是一个缩略版本不是原文
7#
发表于 2020-8-21 15:42:43 | 只看该作者
数学第3题III也对吧??
8#
发表于 2020-9-3 12:19:58 | 只看该作者
第3题 I II III 都对啊。。。
9#
发表于 2020-9-4 14:54:58 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
10#
发表于 2020-9-4 18:57:59 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-14 17:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部