CR问题求助

CD用户1380210 · 发表于 2019-5-2 06:05:11

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A new drug, taken twice daily for one month, is an effective treatment for a certain disease. The drug now most commonly prescribed for the disease occasionally has serious side effects such as seizures; in field tests, the new drug`s side effects, though no worse than mild nausea, turned out to be much more frequent. Nevertheless, the new drug is clearly preferable as a treatment, since _____.

A people who experience nausea are prone to discontinue use of the new drug prematurely
B It is possible that the drug now most commonly prescribed has side effects that have not yet been attributed to it
C other drugs for the disease have typically been prescribed only for patients allergic to the most commonly prescribed drug
D people who have received effective treatment for disease do not generally contract the disease again
E there is a nonprescription medication that when taken with the new drug prevents the onset of nausea

答案给的是E 言外之意就是新药的副作用能被抵消
但是有一点很困惑题目提到 though no worse than mild nausea，但是e里说可以prevents the onset of nausea
去预防一个本身就不会发生的副作用有意义嘛？

求拍砖

leonlo · 发表于 2019-5-16 09:23:10

他说新药也会恶心只是程度没那么严重，但是频繁。加了非处方药可以降低频率。言下之意，虽然旧的药发生没那么多，但是每一次发生都很严重，而且没有药能降低degree

CR问题求助

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()