求救 prep一道题

今天也要加油鸭 · 发表于 2018-12-1 22:04:26

A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?

A

Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into the city.
B

The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus.
C

Most of the people currently riding the bus do not own private vehicles.
D

Many commuters opposing the mayor's plan have indicated that they would rather endure traffic congestion than pay a five-dollar-per day fee.
E

During the average workday, private vehicles owned and operated by people living within the city account for twenty percent of the city's traffic congestion.

答案是B 我选的D。
我是觉得B强调停车费已经很高了，可能存在远高于5刀的情况呀，所以那么高的停车费都愿意承担，为什么会不愿意多掏5刀...
至于D 其实我理解的思路和B蛮像的，很多人都宁愿堵车不愿意给钱，那很自然就W了呀。虽然这里有many这个词，但是我排除到最后还是觉得它更合理...

fuckoffand · 发表于 2018-12-1 22:40:49

b的意思是既然停车费比5刀高大家还是坚持开车，说明mayor 提出5刀这个价位无卵用。注意问题是mayor's reasoning is flawed，因为他的理由是因为5刀比公车价格高，所以人们会因为高价格不开车。那么相对来说答案最好也是根“高价格”“开车”相关，那么就是b了

梦里的富翁 · 发表于 2018-12-4 13:40:36

重点在于the majoer's reasoning 而不是这个计划能不能实施

求救 prep一道题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()