ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65. The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live. Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2620|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep08逻辑 87 有一个选项不太懂 求帮助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-8-19 22:53:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the
government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65. The aim of the
increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country,
where most pension recipients live. Statistics, however, show that there has
been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there
has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted
in the unintended state of affairs described?
(A) Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions
had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas.
(B) The pensions were increased when the number of people below the poverty
level in rural areas of Runagia reached an all-time high.
(C) City-dwellers in Runagia rarely travel to rural regions of the country.
(D) The Runagian postal system is so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks
for pension checks to reach recipients in rural areas.
(E) On average, the pensions were higher in rural than in urban areas before the


increase.
这个A我理解是,之前没有养老金增加的时候,农村的老人会从儿女那儿得到一笔钱,但是养老金增加完了就没有了,所以可能就没有经济活动的增长。
但是E我不太懂,我觉得E也是对的,E说的是在养老金增长之前,农村老人的养老金平均比城市老人的养老金多。但可能之前农村的养老金已经能够足够农村老人买所有需要的东西了,再增长也不会刺激消费了,然而城市的老人的养老金还不足够他们买所有需要的东西,所以可能导致经济活动的增长。所以我觉得E也有道理。
能帮助我解释一下E吗?谢谢大家!

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-8-24 15:24:33 | 只看该作者
感觉你对E的看法想的有点远了,你增加了个非常识性的前提:之前农村的养老金已经能够足够农村老人买所有需要的东西了,再增长也不会刺激消费了,然而城市的老人的养老金还不足够他们买所有需要的东西,所以可能导致经济活动的增长。文中及答案中都没有体现出这个意思。
姑且承认你所说的前提(农村养老金已经足够了),但按照道理来说,即使养老金足够了,再增加消费怎么也得增加点吧,而不是 there has
been no increase in economic activity in those regions
除非你能再从文中找出来否定这种比较普通的想法的观点。印象CR确实有时会不说一些明摆着的大道理,但这些大道理不会像楼主想的这么远,至少我遇到的都是些很常识的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-8-24 17:24:20 | 只看该作者
masaki006 发表于 2016-8-24 15:24
感觉你对E的看法想的有点远了,你增加了个非常识性的前提:之前农村的养老金已经能够足够农村老人买所有需 ...

好的好的~谢谢~~~
地板
发表于 2020-9-24 16:50:01 | 只看该作者
我想问下这种解释题怎么做啊?
这道题A答案的确有道理,但是不会过度推理么?我自己选是选不出来的。。。
文中并没有说子女会把钱用于城市中的消费,那么也就不能解释urban city的经济增长。总感觉这种解释题gap有点大,即使我想到了(然而我一般想不到),我也不敢选。
5#
发表于 2020-9-28 18:26:30 | 只看该作者
dooooooooit 发表于 2020-9-24 16:50
我想问下这种解释题怎么做啊?
这道题A答案的确有道理,但是不会过度推理么?我自己选是选不出来的。。。
...

子女把原来用于资助老人的钱现在用来消费了
6#
发表于 2020-9-29 03:36:24 | 只看该作者
选答案肯定是比较相对正确的,A是存在过度推理,有一些assumption。但是相比其他答案要好很多。
7#
发表于 2020-9-29 09:09:16 | 只看该作者
ST5 发表于 2020-9-29 03:36
选答案肯定是比较相对正确的,A是存在过度推理,有一些assumption。但是相比其他答案要好很多。 ...

好的 谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 11:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部