ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2676|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] Help!!OG16 105

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-5-19 18:35:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
求各位大神帮忙指点一下!

105.  Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been
buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried
by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly
relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s
financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might
well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known
to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel
negative rumors about the company’s health.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following
roles?
(A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a
conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
(B) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a
conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main
conclusion of the argument.
(C) The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the
argument; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks
to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to
establish.
(E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks
to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that
the argument seeks to establish



请问 到底哪句话是conclusion?

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-5-20 13:17:24 | 只看该作者
C: Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-25 12:04:29 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2016-5-20 13:17
C: Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic

我做的时候也认为结论是Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic  
可是
OG上给的答案是A  !
然而  The first bold sentence 根本就没有支持Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic 呀。。。
我总觉得The first bold sentence就是一个circumstance 因为它描述的是一个fact  

T T我这样想是不是有问题 。。
地板
发表于 2016-5-25 13:06:14 | 只看该作者
dudu122 发表于 2016-5-25 12:04
我做的时候也认为结论是Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic  
可是
OG上给的答案是A  !

A说的第一个BF是support a conclusion,而不是support the main conclusion。也就是说只要BF1是论据即可,BF1可以支持“a conclusion”就可以,不一定必须是main conclusion。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-25 23:20:13 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2016-5-25 13:06
A说的第一个BF是support a conclusion,而不是support the main conclusion。也就是说只要BF1是论据即可 ...

哦!原来是这样!我懂了!真的太谢谢你了!呜呜呜
6#
发表于 2018-5-8 15:50:22 | 只看该作者
嘤嘤 想问D哪里错了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 04:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部