ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1483|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-3-25

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-25 17:36:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-3-25

Q23 to Q26:


      Why firms adhere to or deviate


            from their strategic plans is poorly


            understood.  However, theory and


Line     limited research suggest that the


  (5)      process through which such plans


emerge may play a part.  In particular,


top management decision-sharing


consensus-oriented, team-based


decision-makingmay increase the


(10)     likelihood that firms will adhere to their


plans, because those involved in the


decision-making may be more com-


mitted to the chosen course of action,


thereby increasing the likelihood that


(15)     organizations will subsequently adhere


to their plans.


      However, the relationship between


top management decision-sharing and


adherence to plans may be affected


(20)     by a firm’s strategic mission (its fun-


            damental approach to increasing


            sales revenue and market share, and


generating cash flow and short-term


profits).  At one end of the strategic


(25)     mission continuum, “build” strategies


are pursued when a firm desires to


increase its market share and is willing


to sacrifice short-term profits to do so.


At the other end, “harvest” strategies


(30)     are used when a firm is willing to


sacrifice marked share for short-term


profitability and cash-flow maximiza-


            tion.  Research and theory suggest


that top management decision-sharing


(35)    may have a more positive relationship


with adherence to plans among firms


with harvest strategies than among


firms with build strategies.  In a study


           of strategic practices in several large


(40)    firms, managers in harvest strategy


scenarios were more able to adhere


to their business plans.  As one of the


managers in the study explained it,


this is partly because “[t]ypically all a


(45)     manager has to do [when implementing


a harvest strategy] is that which was


done last year.”  Additionally, man-


agers under harvest strategies may


have fewer strategic options than do


(50)     those under build strategies; it may


therefore be easier to reach agree-


ment on a particular course of action


through decision-sharing, which will


in turn tend to promote adherence


(55)     to plans.  Conversely, in a “build”


strategy scenario, individual leader-


ship, rather than decision-sharing,


may promote adherence to plans.


Build strategies—which typically


(60)     require leaders with strong perso-


nal visions for a firm’s future, rather


than the negotiated compromise


of the team-based decision—may


be most closely adhered to when


(65)     implemented in the context of a clear


strategic vision of an individual leader,


rather than through the practice of


decision-sharing.



Q25:


The primary purpose of the passage is to


                        



  • identify some of the obstacles that make it difficult for firms to adhere to their strategic business plans

  • compare two different theories concerning why firms adhere to or deviate from their strategic plans

  • evaluate the utility of top management decision-sharing as a method of implementing the strategic mission of a business

  • discuss the respective advantages and disadvantages of build and harvest strategies among several large firms

  • examine some of the factors that may affect whether or not firms adhere to their strategic plans

  • The KEY is E. Why not C???

    沙发
    发表于 2005-7-28 11:30:00 | 只看该作者
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-6 00:21
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部