ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1097|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全test1-02

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-8 17:15:00 | 只看该作者

大全test1-02

Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.


2.     The author’s method of attacking the charges of certain opponents of the new deficit-reduction law is to


(A) attack the character of the opponents rather than their claim


(B) imply an analogy between the law and some New Deal programs


(C) point out that the opponents’ claims imply a dilemma


(D) show that the opponents’ reasoning leads to an absurd conclusionB


(E) show that the New Deal also called for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget


与反对者的指控相反的是,新的法律的条款被修正了。反对者应记得new deal将国家从大的经济危机中拯救出来,虽然一些条款后来被认为是违宪。


问作者攻击反对者指控的方法是什么?


C为什么不对,虽然这个法律不好,可是它的indiscriminate cuts 是对的,有点类似于new deal 的dilemma.


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-16 17:34:00 | 只看该作者
ding
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-20 13:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部