PREP07 CR2 17 好莱坞饭店那题！问题理解上有障碍

zjhuruoxi567 · 发表于 2015-5-17 14:24:22

At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard height tables. However, many customers come to watch celebrities who frequent Hollywood & they prefer tall tables in stools because such seating would afford better view of the celebrities. Moreover, dinners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated on standard height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood restaurant replaced some of its seating with higher tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The statement is vulnerable to criticism in that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that:
(a) Some celebrities come to Hollywood restaurant to be seen and so might choose to sit at tall tables if they are available
(b) The price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at Hollywood restaurant compensates for longer time, if any, that they spend lingering over their meals
(c) A customer of the Hollywood restaurant who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generatlisation about lingering
(d) A restaurant's customer who spends less time at their meal typically orders less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(e) With enough tall tables to accommodate all Hollywood restaurant's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

答案为C

问题翻译成中文是不是“这个论点是很容易受攻击的，因为它提供了理由去相信某一个事情是很有可能发生的” 本人觉得按照这一问法的话那难道题目不是就只是在要求你指出原推理中哪一个前提的错误的而不需要你指出有什么问题吗？也就是说，我觉得问题问的是“你认为是前提1还是前提2有问题”才对呀可是看答案是在削弱，那将答案代入到问题中连起来说不是负负得正了么？！还请NN指点！

alzn2765 · 发表于 2015-5-25 17:00:44

你可能没看懂C选项的意思。C的意思是说顾客是exception of赖着不走，也就是不会吃完了赖着不走。
你再带回去看看是不是通顺了。

zjhuruoxi567 · 发表于 2015-5-27 13:07:04

alzn2765 发表于 2015-5-25 17:00
你可能没看懂C选项的意思。C的意思是说顾客是exception of赖着不走，也就是不会吃完了赖着不走。
你再带回 ...

了解了超级感谢你回答了我的问题啊还是两个多亏你么翻出来啊我自己都有点快忘了这两个问题了

ukyo2003 · 发表于 2015-6-6 11:38:57

这题挺好的，我的理解

At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard height tables. However, many customers come to watch celebrities who frequent Hollywood & they prefer tall tables in stools because such seating would afford better view of the celebrities. Moreover, dinners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated on standard height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood restaurant replaced some of its seating with higher tables and stools, its profits would increase.
因为高桌子让客户视野更好，呆的更短(从而提高周转率)，所以换一批高桌子可以提高利润。
问削弱：本题主要理由是客户呆得更短，周抓率高，从而提高利润，可以2个削弱。1、其实客户在高桌子上也呆的很长

，流氓客户；2、没人喜欢高桌子

The statement is vulnerable to criticism in that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that:
(a) Some celebrities come to Hollywood restaurant to be seen and so might choose to sit at tall tables if they are available (这是加强，另外一般some不选，因为只是一些人，对结果不一定有决定性印象)
(b) The price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at Hollywood restaurant compensates for longer time, if any, that they spend lingering over their meals (加强，因为价格贵，呆的更短说明能赚钱)
(c) A customer of the Hollywood restaurant who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generatlisation about lingering (来这个餐厅坐高桌子的人都是奇葩，呆着不走，周转率反而降低了，成功削弱)
(d) A restaurant's customer who spends less time at their meal typically orders less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer (这个道理有点削弱，但是1、和Hollywood餐厅无关，不一定适用这里；2、没有说高桌子，不是非常切题，所以不如C好)
(e) With enough tall tables to accommodate all Hollywood restaurant's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables (原文说得是some不是enough，这一题其实也有些削弱，但是没有C强)

杰森哥 · 发表于 2015-6-15 12:19:33

ukyo2003 发表于 2015-6-6 11:38
这题挺好的，我的理解

At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard height tables. However, ...

同意！

AnnAys · 发表于 2016-6-23 12:05:20

alzn2765 发表于 2015-5-25 17:00
你可能没看懂C选项的意思。C的意思是说顾客是exception of赖着不走，也就是不会吃完了赖着不走。
你再带回 ...

此贴已收录至<Alzn大神CD答疑集合>

Zoe-Xback · 发表于 2019-12-11 14:22:13

题目需要指出文中自相矛盾的地方
C 选项是指，选择高凳子的消费者，一般不会逗留
该选项指出了文中自相矛盾的地方，直接说其中的一个前提不成立（因为他们坐在高凳子，就是为了更好地欣赏到名人，会停留，而第一个前提却说他们不会逗留）

PREP07 CR2 17 好莱坞饭店那题！问题理解上有障碍

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块