ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3122|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep1 essay13 Q43 走过路过,麻烦进来看看~呵呵

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-14 21:58:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
prep1 essay13 Q43 走过路过,麻烦进来看看~呵呵


Essay #13.281(23223-!-item-!-188;#058&00281-00)



Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared.In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.



This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities--that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job--exist in the labor market.However, the question still remains:have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?



Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting.Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs.But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated.In this sense, then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks--know-how, problem-solving, and accountability--can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer.Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.



Question #43.281-01(23269-!-item-!-188;#058&000281-01)



Which of the following most accurately states the central purpose of the passage?



(A) To criticize the implementation of a new procedure

(B) To assess the significance of a change in policy

(C) To illustrate how a new standard alters procedures

(D) To explain how a new policy is applied in specific cases

(E) To summarize the changes made to date as a result of social policy
答案为B,可是不理解,我在文中看不出怎么体现的significan of a change,我觉得好像一直都在围绕 comparable worth在讲一些东西,但是没有看出来讲他的change.麻烦进来的同学帮忙看看,很急。顺便用彩色的字体帮我标出文章的构架吧,谢啦,呵呵~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-15 14:07:09 | 只看该作者
没有人回答吗?自己顶一下,快考了,着急啊...
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-16 22:56:20 | 只看该作者
怕沉了,我再顶
地板
发表于 2010-8-18 17:13:45 | 只看该作者
啊,刚做了这篇,基本没读懂,重读之后明白了个大概,发上来和LZ讨论一下,希望对你有帮助!

逻辑简图:

1:Comparable worth…in last decades…critical(+)…adopt…第一段主要讲了CW是个什么东西以及人们对它的态度

2:widespread…indicate…however…question…第二段概述了作用并提出了一个问题,也就是质疑了CW的有效性
3:indeed…because…but…in this sense…on the other hand…第三段回答了这个问题,肯定了CW的有效性,并说了CW的具体应用


我觉得change指的是第一段的最后一句中所说的很过government考虑adopt CW这件事吧,adopt CW as a policy就是一个change。而且这篇应该是属于特别套路型,讲了一个theory,特别套路重在评,assess是对的。


后面两问还在想...= =|
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-18 22:48:14 | 只看该作者
谢谢ALCAPA的回应,以为真的没人回答了,呵呵...
对文章的整体框架同意,但我对于change指的是local governmental  begun to adopt the policy感觉模糊.答案给的是change in a policy,应该是说a policy 的内容发生变化而带来的significance吧,任然迷惑中,让我在想想...
希望有多多的人来参加讨论!!!
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-18 22:50:12 | 只看该作者
会不会change跟第三段中的comparable worth pay adjustment 中的adjustment有关?呵呵...
7#
发表于 2010-8-18 23:35:58 | 只看该作者
其实吧,第三段的内容我还是没看很明白,就草草的把大块跳过去看我懂的部分了……==|
阅读巨烂,见笑了……
8#
发表于 2011-1-8 15:35:53 | 只看该作者
本章后半部分都在对比 并说明 CW 的特点 ( 与其他的不同点)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-8 09:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部