ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5829|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-12-Q35 to Q37:

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-14 03:28:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Many economists believe that a high rate of business savings in the United States is a necessary precursor to investment, because business savings, as opposed to personal savings, comprise almost three-quarters of the national savings rate, and the national savings rate heavily influences the overall rate of business investment. These economists further postulate that real interest rates—the difference between the rates charged by lenders and the inflation rates—will be low when national savings exceed business investment (creating a savings surplus), and high when national savings fall below the level of business investment (creating a savings deficit ).  However, during the 1960’s real interest rates were often higher when the national savings surplus was large.  Counter-intuitive behavior also occurred when real interest rates skyrocketed from 2 percent in 1980 to 7 percent in 1982, even though national savings and investments were roughly equal throughout the period.  Clearly, real interest rates respond to influences other than the savings/investment nexus.  Indeed, real interest rates may themselves influence swings in the savings and investment rates.  As real interest rates shot up after 1979, foreign investors poured capital into the United States, the price of domestic goods increased prohibitively abroad, and the price of foreign-made goods became lower in the United States.  As a result, domestic economic activity and the ability of businesses to save and invest were restrained.





Q37:   The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding the economists mentioned in line 1?
        
A.    Their beliefs are contradicted by certain economic phenomena that occurred in the United States during the 1960’s and the 1980’s.
B.    Their theory fails to predict under what circumstances the prices of foreign and domestic goods are likely to increase.
C.    They incorrectly identify the factors other than savings and investment rates that affect real interest rates.
D.    Their belief is valid only for the United States economy and not necessarily for other national economies.
E.    They overestimate the impact of the real interest rate on the national savings and investment rates.

 我觉得A也对但C也没错啊
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-6-16 18:35:27 | 只看该作者
我刚开始的时候也觉得C没错,但是仔细读incorrectly identified是说经济学家们identify除了储蓄和投资率以外的其他因素,只是他们identified错了,但是文章中没有说他们有考虑其他因素。
不知道是不是错在这里呢?
板凳
发表于 2010-12-3 06:41:57 | 只看该作者

我帮你解释一下

Clearly, real interest rates respond to influences other than the savings/investment nexus这段话是引自原文的,所代表的观点本文作者
的观点,与the economists mentioned in line 1的观点是相左的。

再看选项C.They incorrectly identify the factors other than savings and investment rates that affect real interest rates.
应该这样说they incorrectly identify the factors that affect real interest rates
are onlysavings and investment rates
地板
发表于 2011-7-28 21:56:46 | 只看该作者
原文说Indeed, real interest rates may themselves influence swings in the savings and investment rates


.
E.    They overestimate the impact of the real interest rate on the national savings and investment rates.

那E也对啊
5#
发表于 2011-8-23 20:49:15 | 只看该作者
原文说Indeed, real interest rates may themselves influence swings in the savings and investment rates


.
E.    They overestimate the impact of the real interest rate on the national savings and investment rates.

那E也对啊
-- by 会员 纳丁Cat (2011/7/28 21:56:46)


对啊,而且我局的额E看起来比A更专业一点。。。A有点太直接了,求解答!!!
6#
发表于 2011-8-27 18:45:25 | 只看该作者
同问啊 E哪里有问题呢?
是不是 关系说反了?
7#
发表于 2012-3-12 09:58:15 | 只看该作者
E選項的確是關係說反
正確邏輯關係: Saving & Investment --> Interest rate
8#
发表于 2012-11-15 20:59:55 | 只看该作者
同楼上,E的关系反了
应该是UNDERESTIMATE
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-17 10:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部