ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1571|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助og 28

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-4 20:52:00 | 只看该作者

求助og 28

Joseph Glarthaar’s Forged in Battle is not the first excel-

lent study of Black soldiers and their White officers in the

Civil War, but it uses more soldiers’ letters and diaries—

including rare material from Black soldiers—and concen-

(5) rates more intensely on Black-White relations in Black

regiments than do any of its predecessors. Glathaar’s title

expresses his thesis: loyalty, friendship, and respect among

White officers and Black soldiers were fostered by the

mutual dangers they faced in combat.

(10 ) Glarthaar accurately describes the government’s discrim-

inatory treatment of Black soldiers in pay, promotion, medi

cal care, and job assignments, appropriately emphasizing

the campaign by Black soldiers and their officers to get the

opportunity to fight. That chance remained limited through

(15) out the war by army policies that kept most Black units

serving in rear-echelon assignments and working in labor

battalions. Thus, while their combat death rate was only

one-third that of White units, their mortality rate from

disease, a major killer in his war, was twice as great.

(20) Despite these obstacles, the courage and effectiveness of

several Black units in combat won increasing respect from

initially skeptical or hostile White soldiers. As one White

officer put it, “they have fought their way into the respect

of all the army.”

(25) In trying to demonstrate the magnitude of this attitudi-

nal change, however, Glarthaar seems to exaggerate the

prewar racism of the White men who became officers in

Black regiments. “Prior to the war,” he writes of these

men, “virtually all of them held powerful racial prejudices.”

(30) While perhaps true of those officers who joined Black

units for promotion or other self-serving motives, this state-

ment misrepresents the attitudes of the many abolitionists

who became officers in Black regiments. Having spent

years fighting against the race prejudice endemic in Ameri-

(35) can society; they participated eagerly in this military

experiment, which they hoped would help African Americans

achieve freedom and postwar civil equality. By current

standards of racial egalitarianism, these men’s paternalism

toward African Americans was racist. But to call their

(40) feelings “powerful racial prejudices” is to indulge in

generational chauvinism—to judge past eras by present standards.

 

 

 

171. The passage suggests that which of the following was true of

Black units’ disease mortality rates in the Civil War?

(A) They were almost as high as the combat mortality rates

of White units.

(B) They resulted in part from the relative inexperience of

these units when in combat.

(C) They were especially high because of the nature of these

units’ usual duty assignments.

(D) They resulted in extremely high overall casualty rates in

Black combat units.

(E) They exacerbated the morale problems that were caused

by the army’s discriminatory policies.

 

答案是C   ,D为什么不对       D的意思是疾病是黑人在这场战争中死亡率非常高的原因

沙发
发表于 2006-6-4 21:25:00 | 只看该作者
D 和文中 的这句话矛盾:Thus, while their combat death rate was only

one-third that of White units,

也就是说实际上rate 并不高

in D, extremely high is not correct according to the sentence above.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-5 00:10:00 | 只看该作者

哦,谢谢谢谢

地板
发表于 2006-6-30 23:35:00 | 只看该作者

I' agree with you. Also the passage talks about the discrimination of Black soldiers in job assignments, here the writer highlights a high death rate attributed to the discriminatory tratment instead of combat death rate.

By the way, I've another two questions:

173. Which of the following best describes the kind of error attributed to Glarthaar in lines 25-28?

(A)   Insisting on an unwarranted distinction between two groups of individuals in order to render an argument concerning them internally consistent

(B)   Supporting an argument in favor of a given interpretation of a situation with evidence that is not particularly relevant to the situation

(C)   Presenting a distorted view of the motives of certain individuals in order to provide grounds for a negative evaluation of their actions

(D)  Describing the conditions prevailing before a given event in such a way that the contrast with those prevailing after the event appears more striking than it actually is (D)

(E)   Asserting that a given event is caused by another event merely because the other event occurred before the given event occurred

 

why not A

174. Which of the following actions can best be described as indulging in “generational chauvinism” (lines 40-41) as that practice is defined in the passage?

(A)   Condemning a present-day monarch merely because many monarchs have been tyrannical in the past.

(B)   Clinging to the formal standards of politeness common in one’s youth to such a degree that any relaxation of those standards is intolerable

(C)   Questioning the accuracy of a report written by an employee merely because of the employee’s gender.

(D)  Deriding the superstitions accepted as “science” in past eras without acknowledging the prevalence of irrational beliefs today. (E)

(E)   Labeling a nineteenth-century politician as “corrupt” for engaging in once-acceptable practices considered intolerable today.

 

I don't understand the last paragraph well, who can explain it to me?  Thanks a lot


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-30 23:38:42编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-7 21:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部