ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1692|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD1-37,怎么有3个答案?请NN发表高见!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-3 17:41:00 | 只看该作者

GWD1-37,怎么有3个答案?请NN发表高见!

这题答案有人说D,有人说A,但是GWD答案是E.好糊涂哦。我选D,请NN 指示!!!谢谢。下附问题及原文。


问题:


Q37:


According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?




  • The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny

  • The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company

  • The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company

  • The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product

  • The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations


  • 原文:


          


          In corporate purchasing,


                competitive scrutiny is typically


                limited to suppliers of items that are


    Line     directly related to end products.


      (5)      With “indirect” purchases (such as


    computers, advertising, and legal


    services), which are not directly


    related to production, corporations


    often favor “supplier partnerships”


    (10)     (arrangements in which the


    purchaser forgoes the right to


    pursue alternative suppliers), which


    can inappropriately shelter suppliers


    from rigorous competitive scrutiny


    (15)     that might afford the purchaser


    economic leverage.  There are two


    independent variables—availability


    of alternatives and ease of changing


    suppliers—that companies should


    (20)     use to evaluate the feasibility of


                subjecting suppliers of indirect


                purchases to competitive scrutiny.


    This can create four possible


    situations.


    (25)           In Type 1 situations, there are


    many alternatives and change is


    relatively easy.  Open pursuit of


    alternatives—by frequent com-


    petitive bidding, if possible—will


    (30)     likely yield the best results.  In


    Type 2 situations, where there


    are many alternatives but change


                is difficult—as for providers of


    employee health-care benefits—it


    (35)    is important to continuously test


    the market and use the results to


    secure concessions from existing


    suppliers.  Alternatives provide a


               credible threat to suppliers, even if


    (40)    the ability to switch is constrained.


    In Type 3 situations, there ate few


    alternatives, but the ability to switch


    without difficulty creates a threat that


    companies can use to negotiate


    (45)     concessions from existing suppliers.


    In Type 4 situations, where there


    are few alternatives and change


    is difficult, partnerships may be


    unavoidable.


    沙发
    发表于 2005-9-3 19:58:00 | 只看该作者

    偶也觉得是D。。。


    板凳
    发表于 2005-9-13 13:35:00 | 只看该作者

    我认为A肯定错,答案在开头几句


    我是D和E这两个选项搞不清初,我也选D,但答案是E,是否可根据 "which are not directly related to production"这句话来解释答案?


    我理解production和business operation差不多意思(是不是很勉强?而且也没提到过importance)

    地板
    发表于 2005-11-9 14:11:00 | 只看该作者

    In corporate purchasing,


           competitive scrutiny is typically


           limited to suppliers of items that are


    Line       directly related to end products.  



    I think D is correct.  Direct=competitive=related to end products.  Then indirect must =non-competitive=not related to end products.

    5#
    发表于 2006-1-19 15:53:00 | 只看该作者
    同意选D
    6#
    发表于 2006-1-19 17:28:00 | 只看该作者
    选D更合理 。文中是这样说的: With “indirect” purchases (such as

    computers, advertising, and legal


    services), which are not directly


    related to production 非直接购买,例如广告,电子,法律服务,这些方式跟产品的联系不直接。

    7#
    发表于 2007-12-19 18:36:00 | 只看该作者

    同意选D

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-13 11:59
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部