ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1435|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

蓝皮书逻辑25

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-27 10:37:00 | 只看该作者

蓝皮书逻辑25

The city's public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

The statements above best support the conclusion that

A. the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

B. political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

C. private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

D. the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm

E. the municipal governement would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

为什么选B呢?哪里和consideration有关阿?

沙发
发表于 2007-1-27 17:24:00 | 只看该作者
先把原文用通俗唱法唱一遍:
政府的公共交通觉的很难提价或消除那些不能获利的服务, 所以应该从政府部门去除. 如果公共交通由私企(就是, 民营企业)来运做, 他们将追求利润, 所以政府资金不用再承担运行的费用了.
作者的假设就是, 私营企业来运营公共交通系统将会产生利润(P = R - C).

你所问的那个PC, 就是人民的需要, 比如, 人民不愿意掏更多的钱做车等等....
私营企业来管理公共交通后, 也要考虑这些问题, 那么作者的假设在什么情况下能被支持呢? 正如B所说, 考虑完人民需要后, 还能获利.

板凳
发表于 2007-1-29 10:54:00 | 只看该作者

D'accord!!!

Merci beaucoup!~

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-29 10:57:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢LOUI1121
5#
发表于 2007-1-30 21:29:00 | 只看该作者
这怎么开茶馆呢?
什么叫DACCORD,MERCI BEAUCOUP?FRENCH OR SPANISH?

6#
发表于 2007-8-10 13:23:00 | 只看该作者
这个在GOOGLE上怎么搜不到呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-11 02:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部