ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 297|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道AA提纲请求帮助

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-22 00:33:00 | 只看该作者

一道AA提纲请求帮助

119. The following is from an editorial that appeared in a River
                    City
newspaper.

“The Clio Development Group wants to build a multilevel parking garage on

Dock Street
in River
                    City
, but the plan should not be approved. Most of the buildings on the block would then have to be demolished. Because these buildings were erected decades ago, they have historic significance and must therefore be preserved as economic assets in the effort to revitalize a restored riverfront area. Recall how Lakesburg has benefited from business increases in its historic downtown center. Moreover, there is plenty of vacant land for a parking lot elsewhere in River
                    City
.”

请帮忙修改一下,这题Recall how Lakesburg has benefited from business increases in its historic downtown center的前后因果没看明白,谁benefit谁,谢谢

- Gratuitous assumption that buildings erected decades ago have significance, ....

- business increase result from ???

- vacant land does not expel the necessity of the parking garage.

沙发
发表于 2006-7-22 01:40:00 | 只看该作者

Lakesburg City得益于它的historic市中心。

攻击点还可以包括:

1。L市的business increase到底来源于什么?归因问题,downtown center到底是经济发展的原因吗?或者是唯一原因吗?

2。false analogy,两个城市之间有不同,L市的例子,不一定能用到R市上

3。either-or,建parking的话,老房子一定不存在吗?没有别的妥协方法吗?

4。insufficient evidence, one example of L city不足以证明所有城市的老市中心都应该保留。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-14 07:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部