尽管分子/分母都是 "age <35"/"any age" most%的研究范围(scope)是 All of the AD-driven orders 30%的研究范围(scope)是 the AD-driven orders from subscribers 其实就是仔细比较原文的文字,就会发现"by subscribers"是区别。lz说的关注调查对象的思路,也很赞~
占了楼,给CR用。。。 一道逻辑题带来的反思。
12.(25359-!-item-!-188;#058&001894)
Finding of a survey of Systems magazine subscribers:Thirty percent of all merchandise orders placed by subscribers in response to advertisements in the magazine last year were placed by subscribers under age thirty-five.
Finding of a survey of advertisers in Systems magazine:Most of the merchandise orders placed in response to advertisements in Systems last year were placed by people under age thirty-five
For both of the findings to be accurate, which of the following must be true?
(A) More subscribers to Systems who have never ordered merchandise in response to advertisements in the magazine are age thirty-five or over than are under age thirty-five.
(B) Among subscribers to Systems, the proportion who are under age thirty-five was considerably lower last year than it is now.
(C) Most merchandise orders placed in response to advertisements in Systems last year were placed by Systems subscribers over age thirty-five.
(D) Last year, the average dollar amount of merchandise orders placed was less for subscribers under age thirty-five than for those age thirty-five or over.(E) Last year many people who placed orders for merchandise in response to advertisements in Systems were not subscribers to the magazine.
Must Be True问题的反思: 今天中午又看了一遍bible的Must be true这章,bible真是好书,每次看都有很多新的发现。 must be true问题,实际考的是我们的归纳推理能力,认真看完这章我发现这才是critical thinking的基础,什么叫safe inference,怎么样才能valid,虽然在CR中的比重并不大,但是在RC中的main idea,supporting idea, inference题型同样都是Must be true. 记得看RC解释时候,很多错误选项OG都会解释为not mention,not discuss,实际上都是指出非原文信息,不能从文章中safe infer,想到这。。。被打断。。。先去开会,回来再总结。
Must Be True问题的反思: 今天中午又看了一遍bible的Must be true这章,bible真是好书,每次看都有很多新的发现。 must be true问题,实际考的是我们的归纳推理能力,认真看完这章我发现这才是critical thinking的基础,什么叫safe inference,怎么样才能valid,虽然在CR中的比重并不大,但是在RC中的main idea,supporting idea, inference题型同样都是Must be true. 记得看RC解释时候,很多错误选项OG都会解释为not mention,not discuss,实际上都是指出非原文信息,不能从文章中safe infer,想到这。。。被打断。。。先去开会,回来再总结。