ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1499|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全80竟然全错,有人象这样么

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-9 08:38:00 | 显示全部楼层

第一题——在文章的第二段有solutions:


(1)The legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removed, and such institutions (省略了SHOULD BE) encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they invest.


(2)In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares. Unless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet and, like the old-time capitalists, major investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’ productivity.


第二题:


由于在第一段比较了两种资本家的区别——"old style"注重长期生产率的提高,而现在的traders注重短期投资收益。第二段:"Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely"意思是说“不可能回到以前的资本家形式”(由于社会立法、经济环境的改变等),所以“today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors”,即通过其他的方法使短期投资者成为将来的长期投资者。因此,并没有和第一段内容矛盾!


个人意见,仅供参考。


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-18 16:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部