A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker's Beach, the world's sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching. Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker's Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago. Clearly, environmentalists' prediction that the world's Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument offered in refutation of the environmentalists' prediction?
首先结论是environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded,也就是说 Merrick population 不会减少, 作者的论据是 the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach has actually increased somewhat since“ five years ago”, 而B说Female Merrick sea turtles begin returning to Baker’s Beach to lay their eggs when they are “ten years old”, 也就是说chemical spill occurred 之后五年来下蛋的乌龟出生在chemical spill occurred 之前,其数量的增多不能说明environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.