ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4639|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-11-7 没人问过吗?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-6 14:44:00 | 显示全部楼层

gwd-11-7 没人问过吗?

Q5 to Q7:



      According to a theory advanced



       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave


       of species extinctions that occurred


Line in North America about 11,000 years


  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,


can be directly attributed to the arrival


of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who


were ancestors of modern Native


Americans.  However, anthropologist


(10)      Shepard Krech points out that large


animal species vanished even in areas


where there is no evidence to demon-


strate that Paleoindians hunted them.


Nor were extinctions confined to large


(15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and


insects disappeared, presumably not


all through human consumption.  Krech


also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of


climatic change as an explanation by


(20)      asserting that widespread climatic


       change did indeed occur at the end of


       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes


secondary if not primary responsibility


for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,


(25)      arguing that humans have produced


local extinctions elsewhere.  But,


according to historian Richard White,


even the attribution of secondary


responsibility may not be supported


(30)      by the evidence.  White observes that


Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding


dates for the arrival of humans and the


       decline of large animal species, and


Krech, though aware that the dates


(35)      are controversial, does not challenge


them; yet recent archaeological


discoveries are providing evidence


that the date of human arrival was


much earlier than 11,000 years ago.



Q7:


Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?


              




  1. Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed

  2. New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct

  3. Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras

  4. Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed

  5. New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

          Answer: B? E?


CD里coolgirl  mm 和fair_sword斑竹的答案都是B. 我选的是E.


K对M的理论有两个Objections:


1.Large animal specious 灭绝在无人地带。并进一步推广到small animals, plants, and insects。


2.Climate change确实在the end of   the Pleistocene发生过。







答案B:Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct。


而文章中16-17行指出“presumably not all through human consumption.”表示K还是承认human consumption对extinctions of small animals, plants, and insects的影响。因此B未能Weaken.





答案Earrival of humans和 the wave of Pleistocene extinctions都提前了,因此K的Objection 2中提到的Climate Change发生过就无法解释wave of extinction. 可以Weaken。





??


请大家指点。




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-9 21:17:34编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-9 21:17:00 | 显示全部楼层

没人问过这题吗?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-5 02:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部