ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a tax amnesty program that allows tax delinquents to pay all owed tax without added financial penalty. However, economists projected that the federal government would collect a far lower percentage of total tax owed by delinquents than did state governments implementing similar programs.

Which of the following, if true, would most contribute to an explanation of the economists' projections?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4716

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5453|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教实在不明白的一道题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2010-12-8 10:20:07 | 显示全部楼层
In E, those who did not pay federal tax have decided not to pay the tax while those who did not pay state tax have simply forgotten to pay.  Therefore, the former won't pay back the owned tax with or without a tax amnesty while the latter might.
沙发
发表于 2011-6-13 19:38:42 | 显示全部楼层
nn请教,不知道我这么想对不对呢?
不想交的人:心理是就想逃税,以前有惩罚措施所以不得不交,现在惩罚措施取消后,立马不交税了——program实施后revenue下降——far lower percentage of total tax ——federal
忘了交的人:即使惩罚措施取消,还是容易健忘,还是忘了交——program实施后revenue不变——relatively higher percentage of total tax——state
-- by 会员 托福要考一百一 (2011/6/13 18:30:37)



Close but not perfect:
Federal: 不想交的人, with or without the program, they WILL NOT pay tax since they do not intend to pay in the first place.
State: 忘了交的人, they might pay the tax under the new program once they remember to pay.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-15 15:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部